PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEDTX vs. EMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEDTX vs. EMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class M (FEDTX) and Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEDTX achieves a 17.26% return, which is significantly lower than EMF's 28.47% return. Over the past 10 years, FEDTX has underperformed EMF with an annualized return of 9.35%, while EMF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.28% annualized return.


FEDTX

1D
-0.45%
1M
-1.41%
6M
8.50%
YTD
17.26%
1Y
32.74%
3Y*
15.03%
5Y*
8.09%
10Y*
9.35%
ALL TIME*
7.70%

EMF

1D
0.99%
1M
-4.08%
6M
11.00%
YTD
28.47%
1Y
56.59%
3Y*
30.08%
5Y*
11.98%
10Y*
13.28%
ALL TIME*
6.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.07M$875.81K$895.98K
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FEDTX vs. EMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEDTX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class M
17.26%31.19%-4.16%20.12%-12.35%6.05%16.31%18.91%-19.40%36.42%
EMF
Templeton Emerging Markets Fund
28.47%58.20%6.56%8.84%-21.53%-8.23%24.48%27.20%-14.78%53.55%

Correlation

The correlation between FEDTX and EMF is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2011

0.76

The correlation between FEDTX and EMF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEDTX vs. EMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FEDTX
FEDTX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FEDTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEDTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEDTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FEDTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEDTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

EMF
EMF Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
EMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMF Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
EMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMF Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FEDTX vs. EMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class M (FEDTX) and Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEDTXEMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.38

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

2.92

+0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.30

9.15

+2.15

FEDTX vs. EMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEDTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the EMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEDTX and EMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEDTX vs. EMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEDTX drawdown since its inception was -43.70%, smaller than the maximum EMF drawdown of -76.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDTX and EMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEDTXEMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.70%

-76.97%

+33.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.62%

-19.48%

+9.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.51%

-19.48%

+1.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

-40.33%

+12.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.70%

-47.65%

+3.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.91%

-12.44%

+8.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.10%

-28.90%

+19.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

6.20%

-3.36%

Volatility

FEDTX vs. EMF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class M (FEDTX) is 5.56%, while Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF) has a volatility of 9.81%. This indicates that FEDTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEDTXEMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.56%

9.81%

-4.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.12%

23.39%

-10.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.06%

26.39%

-11.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.40%

21.22%

-6.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.81%

20.86%

-5.05%

FEDTX vs. EMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEDTX has a 1.76% expense ratio, which is higher than EMF's 1.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEDTX vs. EMF - Dividend Comparison

FEDTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, less than EMF's 7.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMF
Templeton Emerging Markets Fund
7.83%9.73%4.28%6.22%9.89%6.92%3.51%7.36%5.92%12.11%1.62%12.81%
FEDTX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class M
3.67%4.31%3.30%1.63%1.10%11.36%0.05%0.48%0.87%1.51%0.95%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEDTX and EMF have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMF has higher volatility (9.81%) compared to FEDTX (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEDTX dropped -43.70% vs EMF's -76.97%.

EMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEDTX and EMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer