PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEDGX vs. FIQGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEDGX vs. FIQGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class C (FEDGX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z (FIQGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FEDGX having a 16.39% return and FIQGX slightly higher at 17.10%.


FEDGX

1D
-1.77%
1M
-2.88%
6M
12.68%
YTD
16.39%
1Y
28.70%
3Y*
14.54%
5Y*
7.02%
10Y*
9.00%

FIQGX

1D
-1.79%
1M
-2.81%
6M
13.26%
YTD
17.10%
1Y
30.12%
3Y*
15.84%
5Y*
8.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEDGX vs. FIQGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FEDGX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class C
16.39%30.50%-4.59%19.45%-12.76%5.51%15.73%18.27%-1.82%
FIQGX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z
17.10%31.96%-3.54%20.94%-11.74%6.86%17.11%19.81%-1.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FEDGX and FIQGX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

1.00

The correlation between FEDGX and FIQGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEDGX vs. FIQGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEDGX
FEDGX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FEDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FEDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FIQGX
FIQGX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FIQGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEDGX vs. FIQGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class C (FEDGX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z (FIQGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEDGXFIQGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.37

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

3.15

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.58

11.28

-0.71

FEDGX vs. FIQGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEDGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the FIQGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEDGX and FIQGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEDGX vs. FIQGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEDGX drawdown since its inception was -44.26%, which is greater than FIQGX's maximum drawdown of -38.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDGX and FIQGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEDGXFIQGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.26%

-38.41%

-5.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.66%

-9.55%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.77%

-17.26%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.29%

-27.36%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.43%

-4.34%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.48%

-6.85%

-2.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

2.66%

+0.05%

Volatility

FEDGX vs. FIQGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class C (FEDGX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z (FIQGX) have volatilities of 6.54% and 6.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEDGXFIQGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.54%

6.58%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.64%

12.67%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.67%

14.69%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.40%

14.40%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.76%

16.84%

-1.08%

FEDGX vs. FIQGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEDGX has a 2.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FIQGX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEDGX vs. FIQGX - Dividend Comparison

FEDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, less than FIQGX's 4.16% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FEDGX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class C
3.27%3.81%3.01%1.09%0.57%10.88%0.00%0.00%0.49%1.54%0.58%
FIQGX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z
4.16%4.87%4.07%2.20%1.86%12.04%0.71%1.22%2.16%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FEDGX and FIQGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIQGX has higher volatility (6.58%) compared to FEDGX (6.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEDGX dropped -44.26% vs FIQGX's -38.41%.

FIQGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEDGX and FIQGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer