FEDCX vs. PYELX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Fund (FEDCX) and Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX).
FEDCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 17, 2011. PYELX is managed by Paydenfunds. It was launched on Nov 1, 2011.
Performance
FEDCX vs. PYELX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FEDCX vs. PYELX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEDCX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Fund | -1.01% | 14.91% | 7.39% | 11.92% | -16.08% | -1.28% | 4.78% | 10.50% | -4.55% | 10.59% |
PYELX Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund | -3.00% | 19.79% | -3.48% | 13.16% | -11.28% | -7.83% | 1.79% | 13.92% | -8.16% | 15.38% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEDCX achieves a -1.01% return, which is significantly higher than PYELX's -3.00% return. Over the past 10 years, FEDCX has outperformed PYELX with an annualized return of 4.29%, while PYELX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.42% annualized return.
FEDCX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -3.24%
- YTD
- -1.01%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 10.61%
- 3Y*
- 10.40%
- 5Y*
- 3.39%
- 10Y*
- 4.29%
PYELX
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -5.30%
- YTD
- -3.00%
- 6M
- 0.18%
- 1Y
- 11.73%
- 3Y*
- 6.28%
- 5Y*
- 2.19%
- 10Y*
- 2.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FEDCX vs. PYELX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEDCX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than PYELX's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FEDCX vs. PYELX — Risk / Return Rank
FEDCX
PYELX
FEDCX vs. PYELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Fund (FEDCX) and Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEDCX | PYELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.13 | 0.11 | +2.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.01 | 1.22 | +1.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.77 | -0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | 0.24 | +2.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.10 | 3.45 | +6.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEDCX | PYELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 0.11 | +2.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.04 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.07 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.03 | +0.68 |
Correlation
The correlation between FEDCX and PYELX is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FEDCX vs. PYELX - Dividend Comparison
FEDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.51%, less than PYELX's 7.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEDCX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Fund | 5.51% | 5.97% | 5.18% | 5.55% | 3.84% | 3.81% | 4.99% | 5.89% | 6.08% | 7.33% | 7.03% | 5.61% |
PYELX Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund | 7.49% | 7.32% | 7.08% | 5.38% | 5.93% | 5.36% | 4.69% | 5.46% | 6.67% | 6.15% | 5.44% | 5.26% |
Drawdowns
FEDCX vs. PYELX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEDCX drawdown since its inception was -26.00%, smaller than the maximum PYELX drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDCX and PYELX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEDCX | PYELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.00% | -56.98% | +30.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.76% | -50.21% | +45.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.00% | -51.98% | +25.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.00% | -52.62% | +26.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.73% | -6.64% | +2.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.40% | -16.96% | +12.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.14% | 3.54% | -2.40% |
Volatility
FEDCX vs. PYELX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Fund (FEDCX) is 1.92%, while Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX) has a volatility of 3.36%. This indicates that FEDCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FEDCX | PYELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.92% | 3.36% | -1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.07% | 4.66% | -1.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.22% | 111.80% | -106.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.27% | 50.59% | -44.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.59% | 36.37% | -29.78% |