PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEDCX vs. IMCDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FEDCX vs. IMCDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Fund (FEDCX) and Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund (IMCDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FEDCX vs. IMCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEDCX
Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Fund
-1.36%14.91%7.39%11.92%-16.08%-1.28%4.78%10.50%-4.55%10.59%
IMCDX
Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund
0.00%0.00%6.44%8.51%-13.79%0.08%8.35%13.65%-1.77%9.40%

Returns By Period


FEDCX

1D
-0.12%
1M
-4.03%
YTD
-1.36%
6M
2.12%
1Y
10.62%
3Y*
10.26%
5Y*
3.39%
10Y*
4.26%

IMCDX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FEDCX vs. IMCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEDCX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than IMCDX's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

FEDCX vs. IMCDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEDCX
FEDCX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FEDCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEDCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEDCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FEDCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEDCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

IMCDX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEDCX vs. IMCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Fund (FEDCX) and Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund (IMCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEDCXIMCDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.97

FEDCX vs. IMCDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEDCXIMCDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

Correlation

The correlation between FEDCX and IMCDX is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FEDCX vs. IMCDX - Dividend Comparison

FEDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%, while IMCDX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEDCX
Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Fund
5.53%5.97%5.18%5.55%3.84%3.81%4.99%5.89%6.08%7.33%7.03%5.61%
IMCDX
Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund
0.00%0.00%4.08%4.21%3.80%6.14%4.64%4.99%5.30%4.79%5.22%5.11%

Drawdowns

FEDCX vs. IMCDX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FEDCXIMCDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

Volatility

FEDCX vs. IMCDX - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FEDCXIMCDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.59%