PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEDCX vs. FSSMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEDCX vs. FSSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Fund (FEDCX) and Fidelity Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund (FSSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEDCX achieves a 4.03% return, which is significantly lower than FSSMX's 18.76% return. Over the past 10 years, FEDCX has underperformed FSSMX with an annualized return of 4.40%, while FSSMX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.49% annualized return.


FEDCX

1D
0.35%
1M
1.18%
YTD
4.03%
6M
4.70%
1Y
15.94%
3Y*
12.26%
5Y*
3.84%
10Y*
4.40%

FSSMX

1D
1.15%
1M
4.62%
YTD
18.76%
6M
9.94%
1Y
21.66%
3Y*
15.07%
5Y*
7.28%
10Y*
11.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEDCX vs. FSSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEDCX
Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Fund
4.03%14.91%7.39%11.92%-16.08%-1.28%4.78%10.50%-4.55%10.59%
FSSMX
Fidelity Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund
18.76%2.35%12.50%17.16%-13.90%23.25%13.03%29.57%-7.70%19.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FEDCX and FSSMX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2012

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEDCX vs. FSSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEDCX
FEDCX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FEDCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEDCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEDCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FEDCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEDCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

FSSMX
FSSMX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FSSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FSSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEDCX vs. FSSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Fund (FEDCX) and Fidelity Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund (FSSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEDCXFSSMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.55

1.29

+2.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.94

1.73

+4.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

1.25

+0.52

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.04

2.37

+1.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.17

7.60

+10.57

FEDCX vs. FSSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEDCX Sharpe Ratio is 3.55, which is higher than the FSSMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEDCX and FSSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEDCXFSSMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.55

1.29

+2.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.36

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.55

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.60

+0.16

Drawdowns

FEDCX vs. FSSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEDCX drawdown since its inception was -26.00%, smaller than the maximum FSSMX drawdown of -43.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDCX and FSSMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEDCXFSSMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.00%

-43.37%

+17.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.07%

-9.78%

+5.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.42%

-22.82%

+16.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.00%

-24.00%

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.00%

-43.37%

+17.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.36%

-5.08%

+0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

3.04%

-2.14%

Volatility

FEDCX vs. FSSMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Fund (FEDCX) is 1.64%, while Fidelity Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund (FSSMX) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that FEDCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEDCXFSSMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.64%

4.67%

-3.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.75%

14.85%

-11.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.64%

18.00%

-13.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.35%

20.33%

-13.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.62%

21.15%

-14.53%

FEDCX vs. FSSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEDCX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FSSMX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEDCX vs. FSSMX - Dividend Comparison

FEDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, while FSSMX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEDCX
Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Fund
5.82%5.97%5.18%5.55%3.84%3.81%4.99%5.89%6.08%7.33%7.03%5.61%
FSSMX
Fidelity Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund
0.00%0.00%3.10%0.78%9.73%12.87%2.31%4.03%21.01%4.12%0.92%1.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEDCX and FSSMX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSSMX has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to FEDCX (1.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEDCX dropped -26.00% vs FSSMX's -43.37%.

FEDCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.55 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEDCX and FSSMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer