PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEDAX vs. DEMCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEDAX vs. DEMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class A (FEDAX) and Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEDAX achieves a 18.02% return, which is significantly lower than DEMCX's 67.60% return. Over the past 10 years, FEDAX has underperformed DEMCX with an annualized return of 9.59%, while DEMCX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.80% annualized return.


FEDAX

1D
2.79%
1M
-0.93%
6M
8.61%
YTD
18.02%
1Y
33.66%
3Y*
15.13%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*
9.59%
ALL TIME*
7.99%

DEMCX

1D
8.32%
1M
-18.28%
6M
33.85%
YTD
67.60%
1Y
153.43%
3Y*
49.76%
5Y*
21.94%
10Y*
16.80%
ALL TIME*
9.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FEDAX vs. DEMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEDAX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class A
18.02%31.49%-3.90%20.38%-12.13%6.39%16.62%19.32%-19.19%36.46%
DEMCX
Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C
67.60%84.86%5.47%16.47%-29.38%-3.05%24.55%23.16%-17.94%40.59%

Correlation

The correlation between FEDAX and DEMCX is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2011

0.81

The correlation between FEDAX and DEMCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEDAX vs. DEMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FEDAX
FEDAX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FEDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FEDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

DEMCX
DEMCX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DEMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
DEMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FEDAX vs. DEMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class A (FEDAX) and Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEDAXDEMCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.43

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

3.98

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.31

16.56

-5.26

FEDAX vs. DEMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEDAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the DEMCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEDAX and DEMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEDAX vs. DEMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEDAX drawdown since its inception was -43.35%, smaller than the maximum DEMCX drawdown of -63.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDAX and DEMCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEDAXDEMCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.35%

-63.54%

+20.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.58%

-36.58%

+27.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.42%

-36.58%

+19.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.68%

-38.96%

+11.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.35%

-47.21%

+3.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.44%

-31.31%

+27.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.91%

-19.59%

+10.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

8.76%

-5.93%

Volatility

FEDAX vs. DEMCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class A (FEDAX) is 5.57%, while Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX) has a volatility of 25.07%. This indicates that FEDAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEDAXDEMCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.57%

25.07%

-19.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.15%

49.53%

-36.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.12%

52.91%

-37.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.44%

30.11%

-15.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.85%

25.79%

-9.94%

FEDAX vs. DEMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEDAX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is lower than DEMCX's 2.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEDAX vs. DEMCX - Dividend Comparison

FEDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, less than DEMCX's 12.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEMCX
Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C
12.22%20.47%1.09%2.03%0.69%2.58%0.61%0.00%0.00%1.03%0.08%0.00%
FEDAX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class A
3.87%4.57%3.79%1.85%1.41%11.64%0.31%0.74%1.54%1.50%1.13%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEDAX and DEMCX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEMCX has higher volatility (25.07%) compared to FEDAX (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEDAX dropped -43.35% vs DEMCX's -63.54%.

DEMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEDAX and DEMCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer