FECGX vs. UMBHX
FECGX (Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund) and UMBHX (Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FECGX charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for UMBHX.
Performance
FECGX vs. UMBHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FECGX
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 5.85%
- YTD
- 18.46%
- 6M
- 16.79%
- 1Y
- 39.39%
- 3Y*
- 18.78%
- 5Y*
- 6.22%
- 10Y*
- —
UMBHX
- 1D
- 2.34%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FECGX vs. UMBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FECGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.00% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | 0.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between FECGX and UMBHX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FECGX vs. UMBHX — Risk / Return Rank
FECGX
UMBHX
FECGX vs. UMBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FECGX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.96 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.68 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.20 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FECGX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 1.79 | -1.40 |
Drawdowns
FECGX vs. UMBHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FECGX drawdown since its inception was -41.85%, which is greater than UMBHX's maximum drawdown of -1.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FECGX and UMBHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FECGX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.85% | -1.86% | -39.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.76% | -0.84% | -14.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.10% | — | — |
Volatility
FECGX vs. UMBHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FECGX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.44% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.86% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.35% | 30.30% | -8.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.54% | 30.30% | -5.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.19% | 30.30% | -3.11% |
FECGX vs. UMBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FECGX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than UMBHX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
FECGX vs. UMBHX - Dividend Comparison
FECGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, while UMBHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FECGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.46% | 0.54% | 1.25% | 0.81% | 0.80% | 3.43% | 1.00% | 0.29% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, FECGX and UMBHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for FECGX and UMBHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer