FECGX vs. FLCOX
FECGX (Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund) and FLCOX (Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund) are both mutual funds - FECGX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FLCOX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value Index. Over the past 5 years, FECGX returned 5.79%/yr vs 11.56%/yr for FLCOX. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FECGX charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FLCOX.
Performance
FECGX vs. FLCOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FECGX achieves a 17.75% return, which is significantly higher than FLCOX's 15.12% return.
FECGX
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 7.60%
- YTD
- 17.75%
- 6M
- 17.35%
- 1Y
- 38.09%
- 3Y*
- 17.52%
- 5Y*
- 5.79%
- 10Y*
- —
FLCOX
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 15.12%
- 6M
- 15.83%
- 1Y
- 29.29%
- 3Y*
- 17.73%
- 5Y*
- 11.56%
- 10Y*
- —
FECGX vs. FLCOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FECGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund | 17.75% | 13.04% | 15.26% | 18.90% | -26.17% | 2.83% | 34.41% | 7.11% |
FLCOX Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund | 15.12% | 15.90% | 14.38% | 11.48% | -7.57% | 25.09% | 2.87% | 7.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between FECGX and FLCOX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.80 |
The correlation between FECGX and FLCOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FECGX vs. FLCOX — Risk / Return Rank
FECGX
FLCOX
FECGX vs. FLCOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX) and Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FECGX | FLCOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.48 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 4.37 | -1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.41 | 18.20 | -8.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FECGX vs. FLCOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FECGX drawdown since its inception was -41.85%, which is greater than FLCOX's maximum drawdown of -38.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FECGX and FLCOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FECGX | FLCOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.85% | -38.28% | -3.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.81% | -6.80% | -8.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.45% | -15.60% | -12.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.34% | -19.00% | -21.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.56% | -1.41% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.67% | -4.43% | -11.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.13% | 1.63% | +2.50% |
Volatility
FECGX vs. FLCOX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX) has a higher volatility of 7.83% compared to Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX) at 4.04%. This indicates that FECGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FECGX | FLCOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.83% | 4.04% | +3.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.67% | 8.68% | +7.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.07% | 11.26% | +10.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.68% | 14.90% | +9.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.21% | 17.63% | +9.58% |
FECGX vs. FLCOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FECGX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCOX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FECGX vs. FLCOX - Dividend Comparison
FECGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than FLCOX's 1.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FECGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.46% | 0.54% | 1.25% | 0.81% | 0.80% | 3.43% | 1.00% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLCOX Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund | 1.31% | 1.51% | 1.92% | 1.99% | 2.01% | 1.55% | 2.28% | 3.82% | 2.79% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FECGX and FLCOX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FECGX has higher volatility (7.83%) compared to FLCOX (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FECGX dropped -41.85% vs FLCOX's -38.28%.
FLCOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FECGX and FLCOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer