FEBZ vs. PBQQ

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FEBZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF) and PBQQ (PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. FEBZ is passively managed, while PBQQ is actively managed. Over the past year, FEBZ returned 16.38% vs 16.05% for PBQQ. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FEBZ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PBQQ.

Performance

FEBZ vs. PBQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF (FEBZ) and PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FEBZ having a 8.27% return and PBQQ slightly higher at 8.46%.

FEBZ

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: 1.22%
• 6M: 6.89%
• YTD: 8.27%
• 1Y: 16.38%
• 3Y*: 14.62%
• 5Y*: 10.57%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.98%

PBQQ

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: 0.14%
• 6M: 7.35%
• YTD: 8.46%
• 1Y: 16.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FEBZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF	$288.75K	$138.93K	$218.46K
PBQQ PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF	$351.32K	$350.21K	$913.43K

FEBZ vs. PBQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FEBZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF	8.27%	12.97%
PBQQ PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF	8.46%	15.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FEBZ and PBQQ is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2025	0.92

The correlation between FEBZ and PBQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FEBZ vs. PBQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FEBZ

FEBZ Risk / Return Rank: 63
FEBZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FEBZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
FEBZ Omega Ratio Rank: 61
FEBZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
FEBZ Martin Ratio Rank: 68

PBQQ

PBQQ Risk / Return Rank: 85
PBQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
PBQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
PBQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 85
PBQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
PBQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FEBZ vs. PBQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF (FEBZ) and PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEBZ	PBQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	2.07	-0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.31	3.06	-0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.39	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.30	3.42	-1.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.19	14.56	-5.37

FEBZ vs. PBQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEBZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the PBQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEBZ and PBQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FEBZ vs. PBQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEBZ drawdown since its inception was -17.50%, which is greater than PBQQ's maximum drawdown of -12.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEBZ and PBQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEBZ	PBQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.50%	-12.92%	-4.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.14%	-4.71%	-2.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.23%	-0.79%	+0.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.27%	-1.23%	-2.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.79%	1.10%	+0.69%

Volatility

FEBZ vs. PBQQ - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF (FEBZ) and PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) have volatilities of 3.00% and 3.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEBZ	PBQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.00%	3.07%	-0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.72%	6.37%	+1.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.97%	7.79%	+2.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.55%	11.64%	+0.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.32%	11.64%	+0.68%

FEBZ vs. PBQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEBZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PBQQ's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEBZ vs. PBQQ - Dividend Comparison

FEBZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, more than PBQQ's 0.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FEBZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF	2.95%	3.20%	3.88%	6.81%
PBQQ PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEBZ and PBQQ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, FEBZ and PBQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FEBZ or PBQQ?

PBQQ has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to FEBZ (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEBZ dropped -17.50% vs PBQQ's -12.92%.

Which ETF is better, FEBZ or PBQQ?

On 1-year performance, FEBZ leads with 16.38% vs 16.05% for PBQQ. On fees, PBQQ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FEBZ or PBQQ?

Over the 1-year period, FEBZ has performed better with a 16.38% return vs 16.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEBZ or PBQQ?

PBQQ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for FEBZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEBZ or PBQQ?

FEBZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.95%, compared with 0.01% for PBQQ.

What is the main difference between FEBZ and PBQQ?

They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for FEBZ and 0.50% for PBQQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PBQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.