FEBW vs. PMDE

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

FEBW (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Feb ETF) and PMDE (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December) are both exchange-traded funds - FEBW is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz, while PMDE is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY). FEBW is actively managed, while PMDE is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FEBW charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PMDE.

Performance

FEBW vs. PMDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Feb ETF (FEBW) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December (PMDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEBW achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly higher than PMDE's 2.39% return.

FEBW

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: -0.29%
• YTD: 4.05%
• 6M: 4.05%
• 1Y: 11.51%
• 3Y*: 10.63%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PMDE

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: -0.04%
• YTD: 2.39%
• 6M: 2.33%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEBW vs. PMDE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FEBW Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Feb ETF	4.05%	1.10%
PMDE PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December	2.39%	0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FEBW and PMDE is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2025	0.84

Return for Risk

FEBW vs. PMDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEBW

FEBW Risk / Return Rank: 82
FEBW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FEBW Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FEBW Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FEBW Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FEBW Martin Ratio Rank: 83

PMDE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEBW vs. PMDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Feb ETF (FEBW) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December (PMDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEBW	PMDE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.48	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.82	—	—

Drawdowns

FEBW vs. PMDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEBW drawdown since its inception was -8.82%, which is greater than PMDE's maximum drawdown of -1.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEBW and PMDE.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEBW	PMDE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.82%	-1.59%	-7.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-0.33%	-0.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.67%	-0.26%	-0.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.78%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FEBW	PMDE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.43%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.99%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.82%	2.46%	+2.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.29%	2.46%	+3.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.29%	2.46%	+3.83%

FEBW vs. PMDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEBW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than PMDE's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEBW vs. PMDE - Dividend Comparison

Neither FEBW nor PMDE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FEBW Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Feb ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.14%
PMDE PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEBW and PMDE in my portfolio?

FEBW and PMDE have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FEBW or PMDE?

On fees, PMDE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEBW or PMDE?

PMDE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FEBW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEBW or PMDE?

FEBW and PMDE have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FEBW and PMDE?

FEBW is categorized as Options Trading, while PMDE is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FEBW and 0.50% for PMDE.