FEBW vs. OILK

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

FEBW (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Feb ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FEBW is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. FEBW is actively managed, while OILK is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FEBW returned 10.87%/yr vs 17.93%/yr for OILK. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FEBW charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.

Performance

FEBW vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Feb ETF (FEBW) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEBW achieves a 3.97% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 58.67% return.

FEBW

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 3.97%
• 6M: 4.72%
• 1Y: 12.94%
• 3Y*: 10.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OILK

• 1D: -1.50%
• 1M: 2.45%
• YTD: 58.67%
• 6M: 52.94%
• 1Y: 53.67%
• 3Y*: 17.93%
• 5Y*: 16.92%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEBW vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FEBW Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Feb ETF	3.97%	9.63%	11.37%	10.63%
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF	58.67%	-11.86%	8.18%	2.79%

Correlation

The correlation between FEBW and OILK is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023	0.02

The correlation between FEBW and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FEBW vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FEBW	OILK
Technology	36.2%	-
Financial Services	11.9%	-
Communication Services	10.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	100.0%
Healthcare	8.4%	-
Industrials	8.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	-
Energy	3.5%	-
Utilities	2.3%	-
Real Estate	1.9%	-
Basic Materials	1.8%	-

Return for Risk

FEBW vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEBW

FEBW Risk / Return Rank: 85
FEBW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FEBW Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
FEBW Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FEBW Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FEBW Martin Ratio Rank: 86

OILK

OILK Risk / Return Rank: 53
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 52
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEBW vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Feb ETF (FEBW) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FEBW	OILK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.69	1.87	+0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.90	2.40	+1.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.31	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.25	3.11	+0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.86	6.27	+10.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FEBW vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEBW Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEBW and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FEBW	OILK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.69	1.87	+0.82
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.71	0.11	+1.60

Drawdowns

FEBW vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEBW drawdown since its inception was -8.82%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEBW and OILK.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEBW	OILK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.82%	-83.76%	+74.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.00%	-17.35%	+13.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.82%	-23.42%	+14.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.76%	-6.91%	+6.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.67%	-32.59%	+31.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.77%	8.58%	-7.81%

Volatility

FEBW vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Feb ETF (FEBW) is 1.06%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 8.60%. This indicates that FEBW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEBW	OILK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.06%	8.60%	-7.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.88%	23.39%	-19.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.84%	28.86%	-24.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.30%	30.12%	-23.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.30%	35.96%	-29.66%

FEBW vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEBW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEBW vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

FEBW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.46%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FEBW Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Feb ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF	8.46%	4.79%	3.11%	5.80%	17.32%	68.82%	0.13%	0.94%	0.58%	6.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEBW and OILK in my portfolio?

FEBW and OILK have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEBW or OILK?

OILK has higher volatility (8.60%) compared to FEBW (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEBW dropped -8.82% vs OILK's -83.76%.

Which ETF is better, FEBW or OILK?

On 3-year performance, OILK leads with 17.93% vs 10.87% for FEBW. On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, FEBW has been the lower-risk option at 1.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FEBW or OILK?

Over the 3-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.93% return vs 10.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEBW or OILK?

OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FEBW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEBW or OILK?

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.46%, compared with 0.00% for FEBW.

What is the main difference between FEBW and OILK?

FEBW is categorized as Options Trading, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FEBW and 0.68% for OILK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FEBW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.