FEBT vs. XLRI

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

FEBT (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF) and XLRI (State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FEBT is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz, while XLRI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. Both are actively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FEBT charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLRI.

Performance

FEBT vs. XLRI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF (FEBT) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FEBT having a 8.50% return and XLRI slightly lower at 8.15%.

FEBT

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.68%
• 6M: 7.24%
• YTD: 8.50%
• 1Y: 17.01%
• 3Y*: 14.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XLRI

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: 1.08%
• 6M: 5.94%
• YTD: 8.15%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEBT vs. XLRI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FEBT Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF	8.50%	6.48%
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	8.15%	-0.57%

Correlation

The correlation between FEBT and XLRI is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025	0.22

Return for Risk

FEBT vs. XLRI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEBT

FEBT Risk / Return Rank: 83
FEBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FEBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FEBT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FEBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
FEBT Martin Ratio Rank: 86

XLRI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEBT vs. XLRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF (FEBT) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEBT	XLRI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.83	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.96	—	—

Drawdowns

FEBT vs. XLRI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEBT drawdown since its inception was -13.19%, which is greater than XLRI's maximum drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEBT and XLRI.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEBT	XLRI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.19%	-7.12%	-6.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.04%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	0.00%	-0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.16%	-1.60%	+0.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.22%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FEBT	XLRI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.08%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.41%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.85%	11.25%	-3.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.71%	11.25%	-1.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.71%	11.25%	-1.54%

FEBT vs. XLRI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEBT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than XLRI's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEBT vs. XLRI - Dividend Comparison

FEBT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.56%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FEBT Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.28%
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	13.56%	6.85%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEBT and XLRI in my portfolio?

FEBT and XLRI have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FEBT or XLRI?

On fees, XLRI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEBT or XLRI?

XLRI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FEBT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEBT or XLRI?

XLRI has the higher dividend yield at 13.56%, compared with 0.00% for FEBT.

What is the main difference between FEBT and XLRI?

FEBT is categorized as Options Trading, while XLRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FEBT and 0.35% for XLRI.