PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEBT vs. JULQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FEBT vs. JULQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF (FEBT) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FEBT vs. JULQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


FEBT

1D
0.61%
1M
-2.70%
YTD
-1.09%
6M
1.59%
1Y
15.08%
3Y*
14.38%
5Y*
10Y*

JULQ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FEBT vs. JULQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEBT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than JULQ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FEBT vs. JULQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEBT
FEBT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FEBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEBT Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FEBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEBT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

JULQ
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEBT vs. JULQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF (FEBT) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEBTJULQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.95

FEBT vs. JULQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEBTJULQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.39

Dividends

FEBT vs. JULQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither FEBT nor JULQ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

FEBT vs. JULQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEBT drawdown since its inception was -13.19%, which is greater than JULQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEBT and JULQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FEBTJULQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.19%

0.00%

-13.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.54%

0.00%

-3.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.22%

0.00%

-1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

Volatility

FEBT vs. JULQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FEBTJULQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.60%

0.00%

+12.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.88%

0.00%

+9.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.88%

0.00%

+9.88%