FEBT vs. APRP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FEBT (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF) and APRP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FEBT returned 20.34% vs 17.90% for APRP. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FEBT charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for APRP.

Performance

FEBT vs. APRP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF (FEBT) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEBT achieves a 7.90% return, which is significantly lower than APRP's 9.34% return.

FEBT

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 2.78%
• YTD: 7.90%
• 6M: 8.78%
• 1Y: 20.34%
• 3Y*: 16.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

APRP

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 1.87%
• YTD: 9.34%
• 6M: 10.32%
• 1Y: 17.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEBT vs. APRP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FEBT Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF	7.90%	12.72%	9.58%
APRP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April	9.34%	7.80%	10.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FEBT and APRP is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024	0.90

The correlation between FEBT and APRP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FEBT vs. APRP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEBT

FEBT Risk / Return Rank: 81
FEBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FEBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FEBT Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FEBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FEBT Martin Ratio Rank: 84

APRP

APRP Risk / Return Rank: 98
APRP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
APRP Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
APRP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
APRP Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
APRP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEBT vs. APRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF (FEBT) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FEBT	APRP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.67	4.15	-1.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.85	7.11	-3.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	2.04	-0.52
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.38	16.51	-13.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.26	73.52	-56.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FEBT vs. APRP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEBT Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is lower than the APRP Sharpe Ratio of 4.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEBT and APRP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FEBT	APRP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.67	4.15	-1.49
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.64	1.36	+0.28

Drawdowns

FEBT vs. APRP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEBT drawdown since its inception was -13.19%, roughly equal to the maximum APRP drawdown of -13.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEBT and APRP.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEBT	APRP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.19%	-13.66%	+0.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.04%	-1.09%	-4.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.34%	-0.19%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.18%	-1.23%	+0.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.18%	0.24%	+0.94%

Volatility

FEBT vs. APRP - Volatility Comparison

Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF (FEBT) has a higher volatility of 1.28% compared to PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP) at 1.16%. This indicates that FEBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APRP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEBT	APRP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.28%	1.16%	+0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.98%	3.37%	+2.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.67%	4.33%	+3.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.75%	9.49%	+0.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.75%	9.49%	+0.26%

FEBT vs. APRP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEBT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than APRP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEBT vs. APRP - Dividend Comparison

Neither FEBT nor APRP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
APRP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FEBT Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEBT and APRP in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FEBT and APRP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FEBT or APRP?

FEBT has higher volatility (1.28%) compared to APRP (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEBT dropped -13.19% vs APRP's -13.66%.

Which ETF is better, FEBT or APRP?

On 1-year performance, FEBT leads with 20.34% vs 17.90% for APRP. On fees, APRP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, APRP has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FEBT or APRP?

Over the 1-year period, FEBT has performed better with a 20.34% return vs 17.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEBT or APRP?

APRP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FEBT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEBT or APRP?

FEBT and APRP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FEBT and APRP?

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FEBT and 0.50% for APRP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

APRP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.15 vs 2.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.