PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEBP vs. GNOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEBP vs. GNOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February (FEBP) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - November (GNOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEBP achieves a 6.79% return, which is significantly higher than GNOV's 5.01% return.


FEBP

1D
-0.26%
1M
2.45%
YTD
6.79%
6M
7.87%
1Y
18.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GNOV

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.91%
YTD
5.01%
6M
5.54%
1Y
17.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEBP vs. GNOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FEBP and GNOV is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2024

0.91

The correlation between FEBP and GNOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEBP vs. GNOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEBP
FEBP Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FEBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEBP Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FEBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEBP Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

GNOV
GNOV Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
GNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
GNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
GNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
GNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEBP vs. GNOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February (FEBP) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - November (GNOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEBPGNOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.63

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

3.76

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.60

21.12

-3.51

FEBP vs. GNOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEBP Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is comparable to the GNOV Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEBP and GNOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEBPGNOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

2.97

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.53

1.68

-0.14

Drawdowns

FEBP vs. GNOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEBP drawdown since its inception was -12.11%, which is greater than GNOV's maximum drawdown of -10.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEBP and GNOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEBPGNOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.11%

-10.70%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.47%

-4.56%

-0.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.11%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.91%

-0.71%

-0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

0.81%

+0.25%

Volatility

FEBP vs. GNOV - Volatility Comparison

PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February (FEBP) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - November (GNOV) at 0.83%. This indicates that FEBP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GNOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEBPGNOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

0.83%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.44%

4.60%

+0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.96%

5.78%

+1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.98%

7.62%

+1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.98%

7.62%

+1.36%

FEBP vs. GNOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEBP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GNOV's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEBP vs. GNOV - Dividend Comparison

Neither FEBP nor GNOV has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FEBP and GNOV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FEBP has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to GNOV (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEBP dropped -12.11% vs GNOV's -10.70%.

On 1-year performance, FEBP leads with 18.57% vs 17.08% for GNOV. On fees, FEBP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, GNOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FEBP has performed better with a 18.57% return vs 17.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FEBP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GNOV.

FEBP and GNOV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FEBP and 0.85% for GNOV.

GNOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEBP and GNOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer