FEBAX vs. GLDM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FEBAX (First Eagle Global Income Builder Fund Class A) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both funds - FEBAX is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by First Eagle, while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. FEBAX is actively managed, while GLDM is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FEBAX returned 9.18%/yr vs 18.18%/yr for GLDM. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FEBAX charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.

Performance

FEBAX vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Eagle Global Income Builder Fund Class A (FEBAX) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEBAX achieves a 7.04% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's -4.72% return.

FEBAX

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: -1.43%
• YTD: 7.04%
• 6M: 6.99%
• 1Y: 19.31%
• 3Y*: 14.84%
• 5Y*: 9.18%
• 10Y*: 8.71%

GLDM

• 1D: -1.91%
• 1M: -8.82%
• YTD: -4.72%
• 6M: -8.62%
• 1Y: 21.66%
• 3Y*: 28.79%
• 5Y*: 18.18%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEBAX vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FEBAX First Eagle Global Income Builder Fund Class A	7.04%	26.23%	8.12%	7.85%	-3.55%	11.39%	4.74%	14.92%	-5.26%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	-4.72%	64.20%	27.08%	13.04%	-0.47%	-4.01%	25.10%	18.10%	1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FEBAX and GLDM is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018	0.38

Over the past year, FEBAX and GLDM have become more correlated (0.66) than their long-term average of 0.38, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

FEBAX vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEBAX

FEBAX Risk / Return Rank: 55
FEBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
FEBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
FEBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FEBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
FEBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

GLDM

GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 22
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 25
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEBAX vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Eagle Global Income Builder Fund Class A (FEBAX) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEBAX	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	0.80	+1.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.03	1.15	+1.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.17	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.27	0.89	+1.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.14	2.40	+4.74

FEBAX vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEBAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is higher than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEBAX and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FEBAX vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEBAX drawdown since its inception was -23.04%, smaller than the maximum GLDM drawdown of -24.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEBAX and GLDM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEBAX	GLDM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.04%	-24.35%	+1.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.65%	-24.35%	+15.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.65%	-24.35%	+15.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.85%	-24.35%	+8.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.59%	-23.82%	+19.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.95%	-6.32%	+3.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.74%	9.05%	-6.31%

Volatility

FEBAX vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Eagle Global Income Builder Fund Class A (FEBAX) is 2.78%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 8.16%. This indicates that FEBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEBAX	GLDM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.78%	8.16%	-5.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.59%	24.22%	-16.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.82%	27.36%	-18.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.01%	18.15%	-9.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.26%	17.02%	-7.76%

FEBAX vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEBAX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEBAX vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

FEBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FEBAX First Eagle Global Income Builder Fund Class A	3.89%	4.14%	5.39%	2.80%	3.03%	7.61%	3.07%	2.49%	2.40%	2.51%	3.13%	3.38%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEBAX and GLDM in my portfolio?

FEBAX and GLDM have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEBAX or GLDM?

GLDM has higher volatility (8.16%) compared to FEBAX (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEBAX dropped -23.04% vs GLDM's -24.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FEBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.