FEAT vs. XRMI
Compare and contrast key facts about YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI).
FEAT and XRMI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FEAT is a passively managed fund by YieldMax that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Dorsey Wright Tactical Option Income Strategy Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2024. XRMI is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Risk Managed Income Index. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021. Both FEAT and XRMI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FEAT vs. XRMI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FEAT vs. XRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FEAT YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF | -16.45% | -4.21% | -9.09% |
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF | -2.52% | 4.60% | 1.43% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEAT achieves a -16.45% return, which is significantly lower than XRMI's -2.52% return.
FEAT
- 1D
- 4.90%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- YTD
- -16.45%
- 6M
- -27.06%
- 1Y
- -9.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRMI
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- YTD
- -2.52%
- 6M
- 1.58%
- 1Y
- 3.59%
- 3Y*
- 6.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FEAT vs. XRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEAT has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than XRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FEAT vs. XRMI — Risk / Return Rank
FEAT
XRMI
FEAT vs. XRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEAT | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | 0.52 | -0.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | 0.76 | -1.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.11 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | 0.79 | -1.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | 2.73 | -3.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEAT | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.32 | 0.52 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.71 | 0.24 | -0.96 |
Correlation
The correlation between FEAT and XRMI is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FEAT vs. XRMI - Dividend Comparison
FEAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 93.83%, more than XRMI's 12.83% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEAT YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF | 93.83% | 76.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF | 12.83% | 12.35% | 11.86% | 12.62% | 12.84% | 2.93% |
Drawdowns
FEAT vs. XRMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEAT drawdown since its inception was -31.68%, which is greater than XRMI's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAT and XRMI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEAT | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.68% | -15.31% | -16.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.68% | -5.02% | -26.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.34% | -4.25% | -24.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.15% | -6.10% | -6.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.03% | 1.45% | +11.58% |
Volatility
FEAT vs. XRMI - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) has a higher volatility of 10.59% compared to Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) at 2.62%. This indicates that FEAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XRMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FEAT | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.59% | 2.62% | +7.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.69% | 4.50% | +19.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.35% | 6.88% | +22.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.11% | 6.99% | +24.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.11% | 6.99% | +24.12% |