FEAT vs. SPYI
FEAT (YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF) and SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. FEAT is passively managed, while SPYI is actively managed. Over the past year, FEAT returned -14.57% vs 18.57% for SPYI. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEAT charges 1.28%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for SPYI.
Performance
FEAT vs. SPYI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEAT achieves a -6.78% return, which is significantly lower than SPYI's 7.92% return.
FEAT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- 6M
- -8.33%
- YTD
- -6.78%
- 1Y
- -14.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYI
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 6.46%
- YTD
- 7.92%
- 1Y
- 18.57%
- 3Y*
- 15.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEAT vs. SPYI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FEAT YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF | -6.78% | -4.21% | -9.44% |
SPYI NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF | 7.92% | 16.67% | -2.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEAT and SPYI is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2024 | 0.69 |
The correlation between FEAT and SPYI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEAT vs. SPYI — Risk / Return Rank
FEAT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPYI
FEAT vs. SPYI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEAT | SPYI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.35 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | 2.42 | -2.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | 11.80 | -12.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEAT vs. SPYI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEAT drawdown since its inception was -31.68%, which is greater than SPYI's maximum drawdown of -16.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAT and SPYI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEAT | SPYI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.68% | -16.47% | -15.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.68% | -7.72% | -23.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.04% | -0.61% | -19.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.69% | -1.80% | -11.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.61% | 1.58% | +15.03% |
Volatility
FEAT vs. SPYI - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) has a higher volatility of 7.94% compared to NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI) at 3.66%. This indicates that FEAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEAT | SPYI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.94% | 3.66% | +4.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.22% | 8.45% | +11.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.72% | 10.46% | +18.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.17% | 12.97% | +17.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.17% | 12.97% | +17.20% |
FEAT vs. SPYI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEAT has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEAT vs. SPYI - Dividend Comparison
FEAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.79%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEAT YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF | 77.86% | 76.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYI NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF | 11.79% | 11.70% | 12.04% | 12.01% | 4.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEAT and SPYI have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEAT has higher volatility (7.94%) compared to SPYI (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEAT dropped -31.68% vs SPYI's -16.47%.
On 1-year performance, SPYI leads with 18.57% vs -14.57% for FEAT. On fees, SPYI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, SPYI has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPYI has performed better with a 18.57% return vs -14.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for FEAT.
FEAT has the higher dividend yield at 77.86%, compared with 11.79% for SPYI.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Neos. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for FEAT and 0.68% for SPYI.
SPYI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEAT and SPYI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer