FEAT vs. ACYS

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FEAT (YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF) and ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. FEAT is passively managed, while ACYS is actively managed. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FEAT charges 1.28%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACYS.

Performance

FEAT vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FEAT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.91%
• 6M: -8.33%
• YTD: -6.78%
• 1Y: -14.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACYS

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 0.70%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEAT vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FEAT YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF	1.02%
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF	2.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FEAT and ACYS is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026	0.18

Return for Risk

FEAT vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEAT	ACYS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.49	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.50	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.44	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.84	—	—

Drawdowns

FEAT vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEAT drawdown since its inception was -31.68%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAT and ACYS.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEAT	ACYS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.68%	-0.63%	-31.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.04%	-0.24%	-19.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.69%	-0.14%	-13.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.61%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FEAT	ACYS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.94%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.22%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.72%	3.45%	+25.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.17%	3.45%	+26.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.17%	3.45%	+26.72%

FEAT vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEAT has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEAT vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison

FEAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACYS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.

Position	TTM	2025
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF	0.60%	0.00%
FEAT YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF	77.86%	76.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEAT and ACYS in my portfolio?

FEAT and ACYS have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FEAT or ACYS?

On fees, ACYS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEAT or ACYS?

ACYS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for FEAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEAT or ACYS?

FEAT has the higher dividend yield at 77.86%, compared with 0.60% for ACYS.

What is the main difference between FEAT and ACYS?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for FEAT and 0.75% for ACYS.