FEAAX vs. PRASX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

FEAAX (Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A) and PRASX (T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FEAAX returned 15.97%/yr vs 9.79%/yr for PRASX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FEAAX charges 1.20%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for PRASX.

Performance

FEAAX vs. PRASX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A (FEAAX) and T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund (PRASX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEAAX achieves a 35.64% return, which is significantly higher than PRASX's 25.69% return. Over the past 10 years, FEAAX has outperformed PRASX with an annualized return of 15.97%, while PRASX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.79% annualized return.

FEAAX

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 35.64%
• 6M: 37.05%
• 1Y: 59.58%
• 3Y*: 33.63%
• 5Y*: 7.11%
• 10Y*: 15.97%

PRASX

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 0.61%
• YTD: 25.69%
• 6M: 27.14%
• 1Y: 45.01%
• 3Y*: 19.23%
• 5Y*: 3.55%
• 10Y*: 9.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEAAX vs. PRASX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FEAAX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A	35.64%	36.67%	20.63%	13.50%	-30.79%	-15.06%	72.51%	30.64%	-15.11%	45.96%
PRASX T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund	25.69%	26.60%	6.97%	0.83%	-22.60%	-4.33%	29.56%	26.75%	-15.13%	40.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FEAAX and PRASX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 1994	0.90

The correlation between FEAAX and PRASX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FEAAX vs. PRASX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEAAX

FEAAX Risk / Return Rank: 87
FEAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FEAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FEAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FEAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FEAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

PRASX

PRASX Risk / Return Rank: 70
PRASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
PRASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
PRASX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
PRASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
PRASX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEAAX vs. PRASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A (FEAAX) and T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund (PRASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEAAX	PRASX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	2.02	+0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	2.51	+0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.40	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.46	3.16	+1.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.17	11.62	+3.55

FEAAX vs. PRASX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the PRASX Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEAAX and PRASX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FEAAX vs. PRASX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEAAX drawdown since its inception was -60.87%, smaller than the maximum PRASX drawdown of -70.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAAX and PRASX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEAAX	PRASX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.87%	-70.53%	+9.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.56%	-14.39%	+0.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.33%	-18.34%	+1.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.46%	-41.56%	-11.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.90%	-45.07%	-12.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.09%	-5.13%	+1.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.17%	-18.50%	-1.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.98%	3.90%	+0.08%

Volatility

FEAAX vs. PRASX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A (FEAAX) and T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund (PRASX) have volatilities of 13.99% and 13.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEAAX	PRASX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.99%	13.53%	+0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.88%	20.46%	+0.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.29%	22.68%	+0.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.55%	19.78%	+3.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.28%	18.64%	+2.64%

FEAAX vs. PRASX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEAAX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than PRASX's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEAAX vs. PRASX - Dividend Comparison

FEAAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FEAAX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	12.88%	6.62%	5.21%	6.49%	0.03%	1.10%	0.84%
PRASX T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund	0.50%	0.62%	1.05%	1.77%	1.96%	14.22%	0.46%	0.77%	7.23%	9.15%	0.46%	1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEAAX and PRASX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, FEAAX and PRASX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FEAAX or PRASX?

FEAAX has higher volatility (13.99%) compared to PRASX (13.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEAAX dropped -60.87% vs PRASX's -70.53%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FEAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.