FEAAX vs. FPBFX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

FEAAX (Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A) and FPBFX (Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FEAAX returned 15.97%/yr vs 13.28%/yr for FPBFX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEAAX charges 1.20%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for FPBFX.

Performance

FEAAX vs. FPBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A (FEAAX) and Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund (FPBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEAAX achieves a 35.64% return, which is significantly higher than FPBFX's 27.65% return. Over the past 10 years, FEAAX has outperformed FPBFX with an annualized return of 15.97%, while FPBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.28% annualized return.

FEAAX

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 35.64%
• 6M: 37.05%
• 1Y: 59.58%
• 3Y*: 33.63%
• 5Y*: 7.11%
• 10Y*: 15.97%

FPBFX

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 27.65%
• 6M: 27.35%
• 1Y: 49.37%
• 3Y*: 26.12%
• 5Y*: 10.04%
• 10Y*: 13.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEAAX vs. FPBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FEAAX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A	35.64%	36.67%	20.63%	13.50%	-30.79%	-15.06%	72.51%	30.64%	-15.11%	45.96%
FPBFX Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund	27.65%	37.15%	9.26%	14.07%	-23.71%	2.28%	32.92%	32.21%	-18.08%	40.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FEAAX and FPBFX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 1994	0.77

The correlation between FEAAX and FPBFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.88 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FEAAX vs. FPBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEAAX

FEAAX Risk / Return Rank: 87
FEAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FEAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FEAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FEAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FEAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

FPBFX

FPBFX Risk / Return Rank: 81
FPBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FPBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FPBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FPBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FPBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEAAX vs. FPBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A (FEAAX) and Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund (FPBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEAAX	FPBFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	2.27	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	2.87	+0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.41	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.46	4.08	+0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.17	14.93	+0.24

FEAAX vs. FPBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the FPBFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEAAX and FPBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FEAAX vs. FPBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEAAX drawdown since its inception was -60.87%, smaller than the maximum FPBFX drawdown of -69.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAAX and FPBFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEAAX	FPBFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.87%	-69.06%	+8.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.56%	-12.25%	-1.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.33%	-19.48%	+2.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.46%	-37.97%	-15.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.90%	-39.85%	-18.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.09%	-4.46%	+0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.17%	-17.56%	-2.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.98%	3.34%	+0.64%

Volatility

FEAAX vs. FPBFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A (FEAAX) has a higher volatility of 13.99% compared to Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund (FPBFX) at 11.07%. This indicates that FEAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FPBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEAAX	FPBFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.99%	11.07%	+2.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.88%	18.71%	+2.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.29%	22.10%	+1.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.55%	19.61%	+3.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.28%	17.91%	+3.37%

FEAAX vs. FPBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEAAX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FPBFX's 1.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEAAX vs. FPBFX - Dividend Comparison

FEAAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FPBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FEAAX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	12.88%	6.62%	5.21%	6.49%	0.03%	1.10%	0.84%
FPBFX Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund	6.42%	8.19%	5.99%	5.36%	8.76%	14.97%	4.45%	0.75%	10.88%	4.36%	2.38%	3.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEAAX and FPBFX in my portfolio?

FEAAX and FPBFX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEAAX or FPBFX?

FEAAX has higher volatility (13.99%) compared to FPBFX (11.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEAAX dropped -60.87% vs FPBFX's -69.06%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FEAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.