FEAAX vs. ETGIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A (FEAAX) and Eaton Vance Greater India Fund (ETGIX).
FEAAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 25, 1994. ETGIX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on May 1, 1994.
Performance
FEAAX vs. ETGIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FEAAX vs. ETGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEAAX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A | 0.84% | 36.67% | 20.63% | 13.50% | -30.79% | -15.06% | 72.51% | 30.64% | -15.11% | 45.96% |
ETGIX Eaton Vance Greater India Fund | -17.93% | -2.06% | 17.55% | 20.60% | -19.86% | 25.74% | 17.64% | 10.52% | -12.14% | 44.79% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEAAX achieves a 0.84% return, which is significantly higher than ETGIX's -17.93% return. Over the past 10 years, FEAAX has outperformed ETGIX with an annualized return of 12.37%, while ETGIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.25% annualized return.
FEAAX
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -12.55%
- YTD
- 0.84%
- 6M
- 2.32%
- 1Y
- 33.90%
- 3Y*
- 20.49%
- 5Y*
- 2.14%
- 10Y*
- 12.37%
ETGIX
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- -13.94%
- YTD
- -17.93%
- 6M
- -15.49%
- 1Y
- -14.36%
- 3Y*
- 6.00%
- 5Y*
- 2.18%
- 10Y*
- 7.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FEAAX vs. ETGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEAAX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ETGIX's 1.57% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FEAAX vs. ETGIX — Risk / Return Rank
FEAAX
ETGIX
FEAAX vs. ETGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A (FEAAX) and Eaton Vance Greater India Fund (ETGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEAAX | ETGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.63 | -1.01 | +2.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.16 | -1.35 | +3.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 0.84 | +0.47 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | -0.67 | +2.90 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.10 | -2.19 | +10.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEAAX | ETGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | -1.01 | +2.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.15 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.41 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.25 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between FEAAX and ETGIX is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FEAAX vs. ETGIX - Dividend Comparison
FEAAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ETGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.63%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEAAX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.88% | 6.62% | 5.21% | 6.49% | 0.03% | 1.10% | 0.84% |
ETGIX Eaton Vance Greater India Fund | 17.63% | 14.47% | 4.07% | 4.85% | 21.62% | 8.60% | 0.24% | 2.79% | 1.17% | 3.32% | 0.56% | 0.79% |
Drawdowns
FEAAX vs. ETGIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEAAX drawdown since its inception was -60.87%, smaller than the maximum ETGIX drawdown of -73.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAAX and ETGIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEAAX | ETGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.87% | -73.62% | +12.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.56% | -22.03% | +8.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.46% | -29.84% | -23.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.90% | -42.71% | -15.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.56% | -27.22% | +13.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.29% | -26.89% | +6.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.74% | 6.71% | -2.97% |
Volatility
FEAAX vs. ETGIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class A (FEAAX) has a higher volatility of 9.61% compared to Eaton Vance Greater India Fund (ETGIX) at 5.74%. This indicates that FEAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FEAAX | ETGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.61% | 5.74% | +3.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.64% | 9.79% | +4.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.30% | 14.21% | +6.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 15.01% | +7.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 17.55% | +3.15% |