PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDY.TO vs. NANO.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FDY.TO vs. NANO.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Faraday Copper Corp. (FDY.TO) and Nanobiotix S.A. (NANO.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FDY.TO is traded in CAD, while NANO.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the NANO.PA values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDY.TO achieves a 101.83% return, which is significantly higher than NANO.PA's 57.59% return. Over the past 10 years, FDY.TO has outperformed NANO.PA with an annualized return of 50.06%, while NANO.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 6.71% annualized return.


FDY.TO

1D
-1.43%
1M
4.36%
YTD
101.83%
6M
159.91%
1Y
597.47%
3Y*
97.06%
5Y*
57.42%
10Y*
50.06%

NANO.PA

1D
0.00%
1M
-16.79%
YTD
57.59%
6M
67.39%
1Y
671.30%
3Y*
93.37%
5Y*
20.54%
10Y*
6.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDY.TO vs. NANO.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDY.TO
Faraday Copper Corp.
101.83%268.92%17.46%16.67%-28.95%216.67%33.33%-10.00%-52.38%105.75%
NANO.PA
Nanobiotix S.A.
61.14%599.00%-53.72%84.72%-50.51%-50.66%77.12%-33.12%-18.88%2.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FDY.TO and NANO.PA is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2012

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDY.TO vs. NANO.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDY.TO
FDY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FDY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
FDY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

NANO.PA
NANO.PA Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
NANO.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NANO.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
NANO.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
NANO.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
NANO.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDY.TO vs. NANO.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Faraday Copper Corp. (FDY.TO) and Nanobiotix S.A. (NANO.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDY.TONANO.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

1.60

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

17.76

14.50

+3.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

61.84

35.69

+26.14

FDY.TO vs. NANO.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDY.TO Sharpe Ratio is 8.70, which is comparable to the NANO.PA Sharpe Ratio of 7.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDY.TO and NANO.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDY.TONANO.PADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.70

7.30

+1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.20

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.08

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.19

+0.05

Drawdowns

FDY.TO vs. NANO.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDY.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.00%, which is greater than NANO.PA's maximum drawdown of -92.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDY.TO and NANO.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDY.TONANO.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.00%

-92.95%

-6.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.95%

-45.03%

+11.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.75%

-72.19%

+24.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.00%

-87.12%

+24.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.23%

-92.45%

+10.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.02%

-33.07%

+16.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.69%

-47.97%

+9.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.73%

18.09%

-8.36%

Volatility

FDY.TO vs. NANO.PA - Volatility Comparison

Faraday Copper Corp. (FDY.TO) and Nanobiotix S.A. (NANO.PA) have volatilities of 23.17% and 23.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDY.TONANO.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.17%

23.10%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.52%

54.45%

+1.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.27%

89.51%

-20.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.58%

99.10%

-33.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

103.79%

79.46%

+24.33%

Dividends

FDY.TO vs. NANO.PA - Dividend Comparison

Neither FDY.TO nor NANO.PA has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDY.TO
Faraday Copper Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%28.29%49.11%93.28%
NANO.PA
Nanobiotix S.A.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FDY.TO vs. NANO.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Faraday Copper Corp. and Nanobiotix S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. FDY.TO values in CAD, NANO.PA values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


FDY.TO and NANO.PA have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDY.TO and NANO.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer