FDVV vs. SCHX
FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - FDVV tracks the Fidelity Core Dividend Index while SCHX tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDVV returned 13.36%/yr vs 13.29%/yr for SCHX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDVV charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
FDVV vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDVV achieves a 8.39% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's 10.72% return.
FDVV
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 4.44%
- YTD
- 8.39%
- 6M
- 8.67%
- 1Y
- 23.45%
- 3Y*
- 20.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.36%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 27.36%
- 3Y*
- 22.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.29%
- 10Y*
- 15.41%
FDVV vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 8.39% | 17.08% | 21.81% | 18.00% | -4.21% | 29.24% | 2.80% | 24.07% | -1.26% | 14.00% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 10.72% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 20.81% | 31.22% | -4.66% | 21.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDVV and SCHX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016 | 0.87 |
The correlation between FDVV and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDVV vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDVV
SCHX
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Technology
FDVV
SCHX
Financial Services
FDVV
SCHX
Consumer Cyclical
FDVV
SCHX
Consumer Defensive
FDVV
SCHX
Real Estate
FDVV
SCHX
Utilities
FDVV
SCHX
Communication Services
FDVV
SCHX
Industrials
FDVV
SCHX
Healthcare
FDVV
SCHX
Basic Materials
FDVV
-
SCHX
Energy
FDVV
-
SCHX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDVV vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
FDVV
SCHX
FDVV vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDVV | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.41 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 3.05 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.54 | 13.85 | -3.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDVV | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 2.29 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | 0.78 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.85 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
FDVV vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDVV drawdown since its inception was -40.25%, which is greater than SCHX's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDVV and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDVV | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.25% | -34.33% | -5.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.30% | -9.02% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.90% | -19.04% | +3.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.18% | -25.41% | +5.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | -0.70% | -0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.81% | -3.97% | +0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 1.98% | +0.25% |
Volatility
FDVV vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) at 2.91%. This indicates that FDVV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDVV | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 2.91% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.99% | 9.02% | -1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.06% | 11.99% | -1.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 17.12% | -2.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 18.15% | -1.15% |
FDVV vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDVV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDVV vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
FDVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than SCHX's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 2.72% | 2.89% | 2.94% | 3.77% | 3.44% | 2.70% | 3.19% | 3.93% | 4.05% | 3.66% | 1.04% | 0.00% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDVV and SCHX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDVV has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to SCHX (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDVV dropped -40.25% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 13.36% vs 13.29% for SCHX. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHX has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 13.36% return vs 13.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDVV.
FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 1.01% for SCHX.
FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDVV and 0.03% for SCHX.
FDVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDVV and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer