FDVV vs. QMAR

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR).

FDVV and QMAR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FDVV is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Core Dividend Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2016. QMAR is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Mar 19, 2021.

Performance

FDVV vs. QMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FDVV vs. QMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	-1.50%	17.08%	21.81%	18.00%	-4.21%	16.80%
QMAR FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March	1.87%	10.89%	16.11%	35.47%	-16.56%	12.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDVV achieves a -1.50% return, which is significantly lower than QMAR's 1.87% return.

FDVV

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -4.85%
• YTD: -1.50%
• 6M: 0.38%
• 1Y: 15.18%
• 3Y*: 17.01%
• 5Y*: 12.74%
• 10Y*: —

QMAR

• 1D: 2.41%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 1.87%
• 6M: 4.47%
• 1Y: 18.84%
• 3Y*: 14.87%
• 5Y*: 10.44%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDVV vs. QMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDVV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than QMAR's 0.90% expense ratio.

QMAR

FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March

FDVV

Fidelity High Dividend ETF

Return for Risk

FDVV vs. QMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDVV

FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 53
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 60
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 53

QMAR

QMAR Risk / Return Rank: 85
QMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
QMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
QMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 95
QMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
QMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDVV vs. QMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDVV	QMAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	1.43	-0.43
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	2.27	-0.82
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.46	-0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.23	2.03	-0.80
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.34	14.07	-8.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDVV vs. QMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDVV Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the QMAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDVV and QMAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDVV	QMAR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00	1.43	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87	0.75	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.76	-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between FDVV and QMAR is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FDVV vs. QMAR - Dividend Comparison

FDVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, while QMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	2.99%	2.89%	2.94%	3.77%	3.44%	2.70%	3.19%	3.93%	4.05%	3.66%	1.04%
QMAR FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FDVV vs. QMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDVV drawdown since its inception was -40.25%, which is greater than QMAR's maximum drawdown of -19.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDVV and QMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDVV	QMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.25%	-19.83%	-20.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.34%	-9.23%	-3.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.18%	-19.83%	-0.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.78%	-0.88%	-5.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.85%	-3.40%	-0.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.84%	1.33%	+1.51%

Volatility

FDVV vs. QMAR - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR) at 3.50%. This indicates that FDVV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDVV	QMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.47%	3.50%	+0.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.68%	4.62%	+3.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.32%	13.25%	+2.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.74%	14.05%	+0.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.08%	14.03%	+3.05%