PortfoliosLab logo
FDVV vs. FDL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FDVV and FDL is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

FDVV vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

FDVV:

7.49%

FDL:

15.04%

Max Drawdown

FDVV:

-0.41%

FDL:

-65.93%

Current Drawdown

FDVV:

0.00%

FDL:

-5.58%

Returns By Period


FDVV

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FDL

YTD

2.91%

1M

4.18%

6M

-0.71%

1Y

12.28%

5Y*

16.61%

10Y*

9.99%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FDVV vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDVV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FDVV vs. FDL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDVV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FDVV is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FDVV is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FDVV is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FDVV is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FDVV is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FDVV is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FDL is 8282
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FDL is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FDL is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FDL is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FDL is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FDL is 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FDVV vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

FDVV vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

FDVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, less than FDL's 4.92% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
3.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
4.92%4.96%4.58%3.57%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.94%3.65%3.35%

Drawdowns

FDVV vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDVV drawdown since its inception was -0.41%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDVV and FDL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FDVV vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...