PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDVV vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDVV vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDVV achieves a 14.74% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 18.60% return.


FDVV

1D
0.03%
1M
3.96%
6M
10.36%
YTD
14.74%
1Y
23.27%
3Y*
20.08%
5Y*
14.54%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.95%

FDL

1D
-0.54%
1M
4.47%
6M
5.75%
YTD
18.60%
1Y
26.71%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
13.96%
10Y*
11.08%
ALL TIME*
8.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$48.97M$49.30M$42.41M
$53.45M$50.07M$46.63M

FDVV vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
14.74%17.08%21.81%18.00%-4.21%29.24%2.80%24.07%-1.26%14.00%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
18.60%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FDVV and FDL is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between FDVV and FDL has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FDVV vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDVV
FDL

Technology

28.1%
4.3%

Financial Services

18.5%
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

11.0%
24.3%

Real Estate

10.0%

-

Utilities

9.1%
15.4%

Communication Services

3.4%
11.2%

Healthcare

3.3%
11.7%

Industrials

3.2%
3.6%

Basic Materials

-

0.4%

Energy

-

11.1%

Technology

FDVV
28.1%
FDL
4.3%

Financial Services

FDVV
18.5%
FDL
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FDVV
13.4%
FDL
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

FDVV
11.0%
FDL
24.3%

Real Estate

FDVV
10.0%
FDL

-

Utilities

FDVV
9.1%
FDL
15.4%

Communication Services

FDVV
3.4%
FDL
11.2%

Healthcare

FDVV
3.3%
FDL
11.7%

Industrials

FDVV
3.2%
FDL
3.6%

Basic Materials

FDVV

-

FDL
0.4%

Energy

FDVV

-

FDL
11.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDVV vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDVV
FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDVV vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDVVFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.39

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

6.28

-3.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.35

14.78

-4.44

FDVV vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDVV Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDVV and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDVV vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDVV drawdown since its inception was -40.25%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDVV and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDVVFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.25%

-65.93%

+25.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.30%

-4.27%

-5.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.90%

-12.24%

-3.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.18%

-16.46%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.60%

+1.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.75%

-9.59%

+5.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

1.81%

+0.44%

Volatility

FDVV vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) is 3.26%, while First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that FDVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDVVFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.26%

4.48%

-1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.49%

8.63%

-0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.36%

11.88%

-1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.69%

14.43%

+0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.91%

17.16%

-0.25%

FDVV vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDVV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDVV vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

FDVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, less than FDL's 3.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.58%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
2.70%2.89%2.94%3.77%3.44%2.70%3.19%3.93%4.05%3.66%1.04%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDVV and FDL have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDL has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to FDVV (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDVV dropped -40.25% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 14.54% vs 13.96% for FDL. On fees, FDVV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 14.54% return vs 13.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDVV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FDL.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 2.70% for FDVV.

FDVV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDVV and 0.43% for FDL.

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDVV and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer