FDVV vs. FDL
FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FDVV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Core Dividend Index, while FDL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDVV returned 13.81%/yr vs 12.95%/yr for FDL. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDVV charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for FDL.
Performance
FDVV vs. FDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDVV achieves a 8.30% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 11.33% return.
FDVV
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 8.30%
- 6M
- 8.41%
- 1Y
- 22.58%
- 3Y*
- 19.87%
- 5Y*
- 13.81%
- 10Y*
- —
FDL
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -3.91%
- YTD
- 11.33%
- 6M
- 11.38%
- 1Y
- 21.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.63%
- 5Y*
- 12.95%
- 10Y*
- 10.99%
FDVV vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 8.30% | 17.08% | 21.81% | 18.00% | -4.21% | 29.24% | 2.80% | 24.07% | -1.26% | 14.00% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 11.33% | 14.79% | 17.98% | 2.94% | 6.66% | 26.10% | -4.30% | 24.41% | -5.99% | 12.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDVV and FDL is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016 | 0.80 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FDVV and FDL has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FDVV vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDVV
FDL
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Technology
FDVV
FDL
Financial Services
FDVV
FDL
Consumer Cyclical
FDVV
FDL
Consumer Defensive
FDVV
FDL
Real Estate
FDVV
FDL
-
Utilities
FDVV
FDL
Communication Services
FDVV
FDL
Healthcare
FDVV
FDL
Industrials
FDVV
FDL
Basic Materials
FDVV
-
FDL
Energy
FDVV
-
FDL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDVV vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank
FDVV
FDL
FDVV vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDVV | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.32 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 4.94 | -2.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.09 | 11.71 | -1.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDVV vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDVV drawdown since its inception was -40.25%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDVV and FDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDVV | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.25% | -65.93% | +25.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.30% | -4.27% | -5.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.90% | -12.24% | -3.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.18% | -16.46% | -3.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.39% | -4.24% | +2.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.79% | -9.64% | +5.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 1.80% | +0.44% |
Volatility
FDVV vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) is 3.10%, while First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a volatility of 3.52%. This indicates that FDVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDVV | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.10% | 3.52% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.26% | 8.03% | +0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.17% | 11.51% | -1.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.73% | 14.30% | +0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 17.13% | -0.16% |
FDVV vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDVV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDVV vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison
FDVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, less than FDL's 3.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 3.74% | 4.04% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 3.97% | 3.18% | 2.93% | 3.65% |
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 2.86% | 2.89% | 2.94% | 3.77% | 3.44% | 2.70% | 3.19% | 3.93% | 4.05% | 3.66% | 1.04% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDVV and FDL have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDL has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to FDVV (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDVV dropped -40.25% vs FDL's -65.93%.
On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 13.81% vs 12.95% for FDL. On fees, FDVV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 13.81% return vs 12.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDVV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FDL.
FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 2.86% for FDVV.
FDVV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDVV and 0.43% for FDL.
FDVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDVV and FDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer