PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FDVV vs. IXN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FDVV vs. IXN

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) and IXN (iShares Global Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDVV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Core Dividend Index, while IXN is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDVV returned 13.53%/yr vs 21.51%/yr for IXN. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDVV charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for IXN.

Performance

FDVV vs. IXN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) and iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDVV achieves a 9.30% return, which is significantly lower than IXN's 33.08% return.

FDVV

1D
0.57%
1M
2.54%
YTD
9.30%
6M
9.44%
1Y
23.92%
3Y*
19.75%
5Y*
13.53%
10Y*
—

IXN

1D
0.42%
1M
3.37%
YTD
33.08%
6M
35.17%
1Y
62.93%
3Y*
32.38%
5Y*
21.51%
10Y*
25.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDVV vs. IXN - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF		9.30%17.08%21.81%18.00%-4.21%29.24%2.80%24.07%-1.26%14.00%
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF		33.08%25.25%24.84%52.98%-29.86%29.58%43.62%47.88%-5.44%41.23%

Correlation

The correlation between FDVV and IXN is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016

0.70

The correlation between FDVV and IXN shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDVV vs. IXN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
FDVV
IXN

Technology

30.5%
99.2%

Financial Services

17.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

13.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

10.7%

-

Real Estate

9.9%
0.0%

Utilities

8.6%

-

Communication Services

3.6%

-

Healthcare

3.0%
0.1%

Industrials

3.0%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

0.1%

Technology

FDVV
30.5%
IXN
99.2%

Financial Services

FDVV
17.0%
IXN

-

Consumer Cyclical

FDVV
13.6%
IXN

-

Consumer Defensive

FDVV
10.7%
IXN

-

Real Estate

FDVV
9.9%
IXN
0.0%

Utilities

FDVV
8.6%
IXN

-

Communication Services

FDVV
3.6%
IXN

-

Healthcare

FDVV
3.0%
IXN
0.1%

Industrials

FDVV
3.0%
IXN
0.2%

Basic Materials

FDVV

-

IXN

-

Energy

FDVV

-

IXN
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Fidelity High Dividend ETF

iShares Global Tech ETF

Often compared with FDVV:
FDVV vs. SCHDFDVV vs. VYMFDVV vs. VOOFDVV vs. SPYDFDVV vs. FDRRFDVV vs. DESFDVV vs. FGRIX
Often compared with IXN:
IXN vs. VGTIXN vs. QQQIXN vs. IGMIXN vs. XLKIXN vs. FTECIXN vs. VOOIXN vs. IETC

Return for Risk

FDVV vs. IXN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FDVV
FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
IXN
IXN Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXN Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXN Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDVV vs. IXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) and iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

FDVVIXNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.24
2.52

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.14
3.09

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.42

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

4.39

-1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.11

14.35

-4.24

FDVV vs. IXN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDVV Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the IXN Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDVV and IXN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDVV vs. IXN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDVV drawdown since its inception was -40.25%, smaller than the maximum IXN drawdown of -55.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDVV and IXN.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FDVVIXNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.25%

-55.67%

+15.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.30%

-13.80%

+4.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.90%

-25.55%

+9.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.18%

-36.30%

+16.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-36.30%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-6.68%

+6.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.80%

-11.26%

+7.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

4.21%

-1.97%

Volatility

FDVV vs. IXN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) is 3.16%, while iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) has a volatility of 12.01%. This indicates that FDVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FDVVIXNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

12.01%

-8.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

20.45%

-12.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.12%

24.03%

-13.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.76%

25.19%

-10.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.98%

24.58%

-7.60%

FDVV vs. IXN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDVV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than IXN's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDVV vs. IXN - Dividend Comparison

FDVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, more than IXN's 0.78% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF		2.70%2.89%2.94%3.77%3.44%2.70%3.19%3.93%4.05%3.66%1.04%0.00%
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF		0.78%1.04%0.43%0.55%0.81%0.58%0.63%1.06%0.94%0.93%1.03%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

FDVV and IXN have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IXN has higher volatility (12.01%) compared to FDVV (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDVV dropped -40.25% vs IXN's -55.67%.

On 5-year performance, IXN leads with 21.51% vs 13.53% for FDVV. On fees, FDVV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IXN has performed better with a 21.51% return vs 13.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDVV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IXN.

FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 0.78% for IXN.

FDVV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IXN is Technology Equities. FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index, while IXN tracks S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDVV and 0.46% for IXN.

IXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDVV and IXN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer