PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDVV vs. FBTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDVV vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDVV achieves a 8.39% return, which is significantly higher than FBTC's -25.34% return.


FDVV

1D
-1.12%
1M
4.44%
YTD
8.39%
6M
8.67%
1Y
23.45%
3Y*
20.08%
5Y*
13.36%
10Y*

FBTC

1D
-2.65%
1M
-18.37%
YTD
-25.34%
6M
-29.78%
1Y
-38.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDVV vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
8.39%17.08%21.78%
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund
-25.34%-6.56%99.56%

Correlation

The correlation between FDVV and FBTC is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDVV vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDVV
FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

FBTC
FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDVV vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDVVFBTCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

0.86

+0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

-0.79

+3.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.54

-1.36

+11.90

FDVV vs. FBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDVV Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the FBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDVV and FBTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDVVFBTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

-0.89

+3.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.30

+0.50

Drawdowns

FDVV vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDVV drawdown since its inception was -40.25%, smaller than the maximum FBTC drawdown of -49.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDVV and FBTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDVVFBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.25%

-49.33%

+9.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.30%

-49.33%

+40.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

-48.00%

+46.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.81%

-16.01%

+12.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

28.41%

-26.18%

Volatility

FDVV vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) is 3.14%, while Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) has a volatility of 9.39%. This indicates that FDVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDVVFBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

9.39%

-6.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.99%

34.38%

-26.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.06%

43.61%

-33.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.75%

50.13%

-35.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.00%

50.13%

-33.13%

FDVV vs. FBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDVV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FBTC's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDVV vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison

FDVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, while FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
2.72%2.89%2.94%3.77%3.44%2.70%3.19%3.93%4.05%3.66%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDVV and FBTC have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBTC has higher volatility (9.39%) compared to FDVV (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDVV dropped -40.25% vs FBTC's -49.33%.

On 1-year performance, FDVV leads with 23.45% vs -38.65% for FBTC. On fees, FBTC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FDVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 23.45% return vs -38.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FBTC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDVV.

FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 0.00% for FBTC.

FDVV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FBTC is Cryptocurrency. FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index, while FBTC tracks Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDVV and 0.25% for FBTC.

FDVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDVV and FBTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer