FDVV vs. AFOS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) and AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDVV charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AFOS.

Performance

FDVV vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDVV achieves a 8.39% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 32.04% return.

FDVV

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: 4.44%
• YTD: 8.39%
• 6M: 8.67%
• 1Y: 23.45%
• 3Y*: 20.08%
• 5Y*: 13.36%
• 10Y*: —

AFOS

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 8.94%
• YTD: 32.04%
• 6M: 37.37%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDVV vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	8.39%	11.24%
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF	32.04%	36.15%

Correlation

The correlation between FDVV and AFOS is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025	0.60

Return for Risk

FDVV vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDVV

FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 64
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 71
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDVV vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDVV	AFOS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.28	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.53	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.54	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDVV	AFOS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.35	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	4.35	-3.55

Drawdowns

FDVV vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDVV drawdown since its inception was -40.25%, which is greater than AFOS's maximum drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDVV and AFOS.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDVV	AFOS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.25%	-11.52%	-28.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.18%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.12%	-0.29%	-0.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.81%	-1.37%	-2.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.23%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FDVV	AFOS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.14%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.99%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.06%	20.19%	-10.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.75%	20.19%	-5.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.00%	20.19%	-3.19%

FDVV vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDVV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDVV vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison

FDVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than AFOS's 0.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF	0.22%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	2.72%	2.89%	2.94%	3.77%	3.44%	2.70%	3.19%	3.93%	4.05%	3.66%	1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDVV and AFOS in my portfolio?

FDVV and AFOS have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FDVV or AFOS?

On fees, FDVV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDVV or AFOS?

FDVV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AFOS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDVV or AFOS?

FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.

What is the main difference between FDVV and AFOS?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDVV and 0.45% for AFOS.