FDVLX vs. PRWCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Value Fund (FDVLX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX).
FDVLX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 1, 1978. PRWCX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 30, 1986.
Performance
FDVLX vs. PRWCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDVLX vs. PRWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDVLX Fidelity Value Fund | 0.36% | 11.32% | 30.11% | 19.57% | -9.07% | 35.30% | 9.33% | 31.68% | -17.58% | 14.11% |
PRWCX T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund | -5.03% | 20.92% | 12.50% | 18.85% | -12.00% | 18.45% | 18.13% | 24.62% | 0.63% | 15.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDVLX achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly higher than PRWCX's -5.03% return. Over the past 10 years, FDVLX has outperformed PRWCX with an annualized return of 12.56%, while PRWCX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.20% annualized return.
FDVLX
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -8.71%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 5.29%
- 1Y
- 18.06%
- 3Y*
- 19.69%
- 5Y*
- 12.52%
- 10Y*
- 12.56%
PRWCX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -4.88%
- YTD
- -5.03%
- 6M
- 3.83%
- 1Y
- 14.87%
- 3Y*
- 13.01%
- 5Y*
- 8.99%
- 10Y*
- 11.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDVLX vs. PRWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDVLX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PRWCX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDVLX vs. PRWCX — Risk / Return Rank
FDVLX
PRWCX
FDVLX vs. PRWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Fund (FDVLX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDVLX | PRWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.84 | 1.13 | -0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.33 | 2.11 | -0.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.30 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 1.93 | -0.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.38 | 8.23 | -3.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDVLX | PRWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 1.13 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.68 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.87 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.90 | -0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDVLX and PRWCX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FDVLX vs. PRWCX - Dividend Comparison
FDVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.01%, less than PRWCX's 16.55% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDVLX Fidelity Value Fund | 10.01% | 10.05% | 33.05% | 3.71% | 7.08% | 9.79% | 0.98% | 3.34% | 16.25% | 3.38% | 1.26% | 10.97% |
PRWCX T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund | 16.55% | 15.72% | 10.38% | 4.15% | 9.44% | 9.23% | 7.97% | 5.83% | 7.46% | 6.82% | 3.51% | 9.86% |
Drawdowns
FDVLX vs. PRWCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDVLX drawdown since its inception was -66.91%, which is greater than PRWCX's maximum drawdown of -41.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDVLX and PRWCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDVLX | PRWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.91% | -41.77% | -25.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.96% | -6.80% | -8.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.45% | -17.07% | -14.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.66% | -26.86% | -21.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.90% | -6.27% | -3.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.05% | -3.34% | -5.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.63% | 1.66% | +1.97% |
Volatility
FDVLX vs. PRWCX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Value Fund (FDVLX) has a higher volatility of 5.32% compared to T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX) at 2.94%. This indicates that FDVLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDVLX | PRWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.32% | 2.94% | +2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.67% | 9.61% | +2.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.51% | 13.47% | +8.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.54% | 13.21% | +13.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.15% | 12.97% | +12.18% |