FDVLX vs. HAMVX
FDVLX (Fidelity Value Fund) and HAMVX (Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FDVLX returned 14.46%/yr vs 10.88%/yr for HAMVX. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. FDVLX charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for HAMVX.
Performance
FDVLX vs. HAMVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FDVLX having a 25.18% return and HAMVX slightly lower at 24.15%. Over the past 10 years, FDVLX has outperformed HAMVX with an annualized return of 14.46%, while HAMVX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.88% annualized return.
FDVLX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- 6M
- 18.07%
- YTD
- 25.18%
- 1Y
- 39.96%
- 3Y*
- 24.12%
- 5Y*
- 16.17%
- 10Y*
- 14.46%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.47%
HAMVX
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 3.58%
- 6M
- 18.01%
- YTD
- 24.15%
- 1Y
- 41.11%
- 3Y*
- 19.07%
- 5Y*
- 13.22%
- 10Y*
- 10.88%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.92%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
FDVLX Fidelity Value Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FDVLX vs. HAMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDVLX Fidelity Value Fund | 25.18% | 11.32% | 30.11% | 19.57% | -9.07% | 35.30% | 9.33% | 31.68% | -17.58% | 14.11% |
HAMVX Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund | 24.15% | 16.00% | 12.10% | 16.42% | -5.63% | 29.93% | -3.77% | 22.93% | -17.82% | 12.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDVLX and HAMVX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2002 | 0.96 |
The correlation between FDVLX and HAMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDVLX vs. HAMVX — Risk / Return Rank
FDVLX
HAMVX
FDVLX vs. HAMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Fund (FDVLX) and Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDVLX | HAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.53 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 5.68 | -2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.02 | 21.30 | -7.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDVLX vs. HAMVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDVLX drawdown since its inception was -66.91%, roughly equal to the maximum HAMVX drawdown of -64.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDVLX and HAMVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDVLX | HAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.91% | -64.17% | -2.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.90% | -6.84% | -3.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.45% | -21.04% | -10.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.45% | -21.04% | -10.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.66% | -51.44% | +2.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.92% | -0.93% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.00% | -9.92% | +0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 1.82% | +0.77% |
Volatility
FDVLX vs. HAMVX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Value Fund (FDVLX) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX) at 2.94%. This indicates that FDVLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDVLX | HAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 2.94% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.66% | 8.88% | +2.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.21% | 13.06% | +3.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.48% | 18.60% | +7.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.13% | 21.80% | +3.33% |
FDVLX vs. HAMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDVLX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than HAMVX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDVLX vs. HAMVX - Dividend Comparison
FDVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.03%, more than HAMVX's 6.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDVLX Fidelity Value Fund | 8.03% | 10.05% | 33.05% | 3.71% | 7.08% | 9.79% | 0.98% | 3.34% | 16.25% | 3.38% | 1.26% | 10.97% |
HAMVX Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund | 6.98% | 8.67% | 5.77% | 7.20% | 8.24% | 1.27% | 2.35% | 3.10% | 8.41% | 3.84% | 3.06% | 3.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, FDVLX and HAMVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FDVLX has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to HAMVX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDVLX dropped -66.91% vs HAMVX's -64.17%.
HAMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDVLX and HAMVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer