PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDVLX vs. FVCSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDVLX vs. FVCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Value Fund (FDVLX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C (FVCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDVLX achieves a 25.18% return, which is significantly lower than FVCSX's 28.24% return. Over the past 10 years, FDVLX has outperformed FVCSX with an annualized return of 14.46%, while FVCSX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.34% annualized return.


FDVLX

1D
-0.06%
1M
2.07%
6M
18.07%
YTD
25.18%
1Y
39.96%
3Y*
24.12%
5Y*
16.17%
10Y*
14.46%
ALL TIME*
11.47%

FVCSX

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.97%
6M
18.57%
YTD
28.24%
1Y
42.56%
3Y*
10.30%
5Y*
8.61%
10Y*
10.34%
ALL TIME*
6.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FDVLX vs. FVCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDVLX
Fidelity Value Fund
25.18%11.32%30.11%19.57%-9.07%35.30%9.33%31.68%-17.58%14.11%
FVCSX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C
28.24%7.23%-6.69%19.32%-8.35%31.94%7.10%33.09%-17.58%16.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FDVLX and FVCSX is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1993

0.86

The correlation between FDVLX and FVCSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.86 (all time) to 0.99 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDVLX vs. FVCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDVLX
FDVLX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FDVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FDVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FVCSX
FVCSX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FVCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FVCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDVLX vs. FVCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Fund (FDVLX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C (FVCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDVLXFVCSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.39

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

3.93

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.02

15.12

-1.10

FDVLX vs. FVCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDVLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the FVCSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDVLX and FVCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDVLX vs. FVCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDVLX drawdown since its inception was -66.91%, roughly equal to the maximum FVCSX drawdown of -70.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDVLX and FVCSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDVLXFVCSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.91%

-70.38%

+3.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.90%

-9.89%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.45%

-37.07%

+5.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.45%

-37.07%

+5.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.66%

-48.07%

-0.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-0.94%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.00%

-11.14%

+2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

2.58%

+0.01%

Volatility

FDVLX vs. FVCSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Value Fund (FDVLX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C (FVCSX) have volatilities of 3.28% and 3.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDVLXFVCSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

3.27%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.66%

11.74%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.21%

17.02%

-0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.48%

20.97%

+5.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.13%

22.13%

+3.00%

FDVLX vs. FVCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDVLX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than FVCSX's 1.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDVLX vs. FVCSX - Dividend Comparison

FDVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.03%, less than FVCSX's 10.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDVLX
Fidelity Value Fund
8.03%10.05%33.05%3.71%7.08%9.79%0.98%3.34%16.25%3.38%1.26%10.97%
FVCSX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C
10.20%13.08%0.00%2.96%2.23%9.80%0.33%5.50%18.83%8.78%25.66%0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, FDVLX and FVCSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDVLX has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to FVCSX (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDVLX dropped -66.91% vs FVCSX's -70.38%.

FVCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDVLX and FVCSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer