FDVLX vs. FMDGX
FDVLX (Fidelity Value Fund) and FMDGX (Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund) are both mutual funds - FDVLX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FMDGX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FDVLX returned 13.93%/yr vs 5.97%/yr for FMDGX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDVLX charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FMDGX.
Performance
FDVLX vs. FMDGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDVLX achieves a 17.78% return, which is significantly higher than FMDGX's 2.88% return.
FDVLX
- 1D
- 2.66%
- 1M
- 3.44%
- YTD
- 17.78%
- 6M
- 16.76%
- 1Y
- 33.26%
- 3Y*
- 25.49%
- 5Y*
- 13.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.15%
FMDGX
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- 3.17%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 4.63%
- 3Y*
- 15.12%
- 5Y*
- 5.97%
- 10Y*
- —
FDVLX vs. FMDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDVLX Fidelity Value Fund | 17.78% | 11.32% | 30.11% | 19.57% | -9.07% | 35.30% | 9.33% | 8.69% |
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund | 2.88% | 8.60% | 22.03% | 25.79% | -26.67% | 12.67% | 34.84% | 4.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDVLX and FMDGX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.74 |
The correlation between FDVLX and FMDGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDVLX vs. FMDGX — Risk / Return Rank
FDVLX
FMDGX
FDVLX vs. FMDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Fund (FDVLX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDVLX | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.06 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 0.31 | +3.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.37 | 0.89 | +11.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDVLX vs. FMDGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDVLX drawdown since its inception was -66.91%, which is greater than FMDGX's maximum drawdown of -38.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDVLX and FMDGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDVLX | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.91% | -38.59% | -28.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.90% | -14.75% | +4.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.45% | -25.30% | -6.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.45% | -38.59% | +7.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.97% | +2.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.02% | -11.17% | +2.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 5.08% | -2.38% |
Volatility
FDVLX vs. FMDGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Value Fund (FDVLX) is 5.20%, while Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) has a volatility of 5.75%. This indicates that FDVLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDVLX | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.20% | 5.75% | -0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.00% | 13.44% | -1.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.46% | 17.02% | -0.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.60% | 22.44% | +4.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.20% | 24.33% | +0.87% |
FDVLX vs. FMDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDVLX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FMDGX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDVLX vs. FMDGX - Dividend Comparison
FDVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.53%, more than FMDGX's 1.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDVLX Fidelity Value Fund | 8.53% | 10.05% | 33.05% | 3.71% | 7.08% | 9.79% | 0.98% | 3.34% | 16.25% | 3.38% | 1.26% | 10.97% |
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund | 1.80% | 1.85% | 0.47% | 0.63% | 0.81% | 6.43% | 0.36% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDVLX and FMDGX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FMDGX has higher volatility (5.75%) compared to FDVLX (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDVLX dropped -66.91% vs FMDGX's -38.59%.
FDVLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDVLX and FMDGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer