PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDVLX vs. FDSVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDVLX vs. FDSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Value Fund (FDVLX) and Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund (FDSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDVLX achieves a 15.53% return, which is significantly higher than FDSVX's 9.96% return. Over the past 10 years, FDVLX has underperformed FDSVX with an annualized return of 13.59%, while FDSVX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.48% annualized return.


FDVLX

1D
-1.91%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
15.53%
6M
16.99%
1Y
32.00%
3Y*
24.85%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
13.59%

FDSVX

1D
-4.21%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
9.96%
6M
8.94%
1Y
23.11%
3Y*
23.39%
5Y*
13.68%
10Y*
18.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDVLX vs. FDSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDVLX
Fidelity Value Fund
15.53%11.32%30.11%19.57%-9.07%35.30%9.33%31.68%-17.58%14.11%
FDSVX
Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund
9.96%15.14%30.19%35.63%-24.43%22.93%43.43%33.77%-0.33%34.63%

Correlation

The correlation between FDVLX and FDSVX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 1998

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between FDVLX and FDSVX has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDVLX vs. FDSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDVLX
FDVLX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FDVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
FDVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

FDSVX
FDSVX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FDSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FDSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDVLX vs. FDSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Fund (FDVLX) and Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund (FDSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDVLXFDSVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.26

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

1.96

+1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.49

7.42

+5.07

FDVLX vs. FDSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDVLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the FDSVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDVLX and FDSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDVLXFDSVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

1.45

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.67

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.90

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.53

+0.04

Drawdowns

FDVLX vs. FDSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDVLX drawdown since its inception was -66.91%, which is greater than FDSVX's maximum drawdown of -59.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDVLX and FDSVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDVLXFDSVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.91%

-59.34%

-7.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.90%

-12.53%

+2.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.45%

-23.42%

-8.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.45%

-29.83%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.66%

-31.09%

-17.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.91%

-4.76%

+2.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.02%

-12.60%

+3.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

3.30%

-0.61%

Volatility

FDVLX vs. FDSVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Value Fund (FDVLX) is 4.31%, while Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund (FDSVX) has a volatility of 5.96%. This indicates that FDVLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDVLXFDSVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

5.96%

-1.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.57%

13.47%

-1.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.18%

16.91%

-0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.56%

20.43%

+6.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.19%

20.63%

+4.56%

FDVLX vs. FDSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDVLX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FDSVX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDVLX vs. FDSVX - Dividend Comparison

FDVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.70%, more than FDSVX's 1.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDSVX
Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund
1.44%1.58%12.81%2.55%3.65%13.46%9.63%4.28%5.02%4.87%0.09%0.17%
FDVLX
Fidelity Value Fund
8.70%10.05%33.05%3.71%7.08%9.79%0.98%3.34%16.25%3.38%1.26%10.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDVLX and FDSVX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDSVX has higher volatility (5.96%) compared to FDVLX (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDVLX dropped -66.91% vs FDSVX's -59.34%.

FDVLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDVLX and FDSVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer