FDVLX vs. FBCV
FDVLX (Fidelity Value Fund) and FBCV (Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF) are both funds - FDVLX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FBCV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDVLX returned 16.17%/yr vs 10.50%/yr for FBCV. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FDVLX charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for FBCV.
Performance
FDVLX vs. FBCV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDVLX achieves a 25.18% return, which is significantly higher than FBCV's 18.06% return.
FDVLX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- 6M
- 18.07%
- YTD
- 25.18%
- 1Y
- 39.96%
- 3Y*
- 24.12%
- 5Y*
- 16.17%
- 10Y*
- 14.46%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.47%
FBCV
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 3.40%
- 6M
- 13.64%
- YTD
- 18.06%
- 1Y
- 33.08%
- 3Y*
- 15.74%
- 5Y*
- 10.50%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $595.39K | $468.65K | $409.72K | |
FDVLX Fidelity Value Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FDVLX vs. FBCV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDVLX Fidelity Value Fund | 25.18% | 11.32% | 30.11% | 19.57% | -9.07% | 35.30% | 33.29% |
FBCV Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF | 18.06% | 16.36% | 10.26% | 5.45% | -2.26% | 26.18% | 17.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDVLX and FBCV is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020 | 0.86 |
The correlation between FDVLX and FBCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDVLX vs. FBCV — Risk / Return Rank
FDVLX
FBCV
FDVLX vs. FBCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Fund (FDVLX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF (FBCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDVLX | FBCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.54 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 4.52 | -0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.02 | 18.92 | -4.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDVLX vs. FBCV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDVLX drawdown since its inception was -66.91%, which is greater than FBCV's maximum drawdown of -15.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDVLX and FBCV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDVLX | FBCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.91% | -15.55% | -51.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.90% | -7.04% | -2.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.45% | -14.32% | -17.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.45% | -15.55% | -15.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.92% | 0.00% | -0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.00% | -3.37% | -5.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 1.68% | +0.91% |
Volatility
FDVLX vs. FBCV - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Value Fund (FDVLX) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF (FBCV) at 3.07%. This indicates that FDVLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDVLX | FBCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 3.07% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.66% | 7.88% | +3.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.21% | 10.70% | +5.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.48% | 13.76% | +12.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.13% | 14.64% | +10.49% |
FDVLX vs. FBCV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDVLX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FBCV's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDVLX vs. FBCV - Dividend Comparison
FDVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.03%, more than FBCV's 2.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBCV Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF | 2.43% | 2.95% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 2.01% | 3.13% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDVLX Fidelity Value Fund | 8.03% | 10.05% | 33.05% | 3.71% | 7.08% | 9.79% | 0.98% | 3.34% | 16.25% | 3.38% | 1.26% | 10.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDVLX and FBCV have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDVLX has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to FBCV (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDVLX dropped -66.91% vs FBCV's -15.55%.
FBCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDVLX and FBCV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer