FDTX vs. TMAT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF (FDTX) and Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT).

FDTX and TMAT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FDTX is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 16, 2020. TMAT is a passively managed fund by Main Management that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Index. It was launched on Jan 29, 2021.

Performance

FDTX vs. TMAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF (FDTX) and Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FDTX vs. TMAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FDTX Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF	-9.38%	15.25%	23.99%	11.73%
TMAT Main Thematic Innovation ETF	-7.28%	20.06%	27.20%	12.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDTX achieves a -9.38% return, which is significantly lower than TMAT's -7.28% return.

FDTX

• 1D: 5.61%
• 1M: -4.64%
• YTD: -9.38%
• 6M: -8.97%
• 1Y: 17.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TMAT

• 1D: 3.34%
• 1M: -6.40%
• YTD: -7.28%
• 6M: -14.30%
• 1Y: 31.19%
• 3Y*: 17.95%
• 5Y*: -0.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDTX vs. TMAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDTX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TMAT's 1.49% expense ratio.

TMAT

Main Thematic Innovation ETF

FDTX

Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF

Return for Risk

FDTX vs. TMAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDTX

FDTX Risk / Return Rank: 35
FDTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
FDTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
FDTX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
FDTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
FDTX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

TMAT

TMAT Risk / Return Rank: 54
TMAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
TMAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
TMAT Omega Ratio Rank: 57
TMAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
TMAT Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDTX vs. TMAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF (FDTX) and Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDTX	TMAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.62	1.05	-0.44
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.04	1.58	-0.54
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.21	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.84	1.34	-0.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.67	3.34	-0.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDTX vs. TMAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDTX Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the TMAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDTX and TMAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDTX	TMAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62	1.05	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	-0.04	+0.60

Correlation

The correlation between FDTX and TMAT is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FDTX vs. TMAT - Dividend Comparison

FDTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than TMAT's 0.02% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FDTX Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TMAT Main Thematic Innovation ETF	0.02%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.34%	0.20%

Drawdowns

FDTX vs. TMAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDTX drawdown since its inception was -27.23%, smaller than the maximum TMAT drawdown of -58.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTX and TMAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDTX	TMAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.23%	-58.55%	+31.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.38%	-21.63%	+2.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-52.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.85%	-19.01%	+4.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.70%	-33.07%	+27.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.12%	8.70%	-2.58%

Volatility

FDTX vs. TMAT - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF (FDTX) has a higher volatility of 10.07% compared to Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) at 7.90%. This indicates that FDTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDTX	TMAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.07%	7.90%	+2.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.64%	18.68%	-0.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.08%	29.80%	-1.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.22%	30.48%	-5.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.22%	30.78%	-5.56%