FDTRX vs. SHAPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX) and ClearBridge Appreciation Fund (SHAPX).
FDTRX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 24, 2013. SHAPX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Mar 10, 1970.
Performance
FDTRX vs. SHAPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDTRX vs. SHAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDTRX Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 | -15.17% | 18.97% | 31.01% | 44.92% | -40.07% | 12.90% | 58.22% | 36.84% | 3.22% | 39.87% |
SHAPX ClearBridge Appreciation Fund | -6.24% | 14.32% | 22.37% | 19.50% | -12.56% | 23.52% | 14.53% | 29.84% | -2.19% | 18.31% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDTRX achieves a -15.17% return, which is significantly lower than SHAPX's -6.24% return. Over the past 10 years, FDTRX has outperformed SHAPX with an annualized return of 15.79%, while SHAPX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.99% annualized return.
FDTRX
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -9.28%
- YTD
- -15.17%
- 6M
- -15.64%
- 1Y
- 15.24%
- 3Y*
- 17.63%
- 5Y*
- 5.79%
- 10Y*
- 15.79%
SHAPX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -7.91%
- YTD
- -6.24%
- 6M
- -5.30%
- 1Y
- 10.69%
- 3Y*
- 14.58%
- 5Y*
- 10.06%
- 10Y*
- 11.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDTRX vs. SHAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDTRX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than SHAPX's 0.93% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDTRX vs. SHAPX — Risk / Return Rank
FDTRX
SHAPX
FDTRX vs. SHAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX) and ClearBridge Appreciation Fund (SHAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDTRX | SHAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.56 | 0.72 | -0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.98 | 1.13 | -0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.17 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | 0.89 | -0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.61 | 4.11 | -2.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDTRX | SHAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 | 0.72 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.68 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.72 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.77 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDTRX and SHAPX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FDTRX vs. SHAPX - Dividend Comparison
FDTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.24%, less than SHAPX's 15.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDTRX Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 | 12.24% | 10.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.71% | 2.80% | 1.71% | 3.44% | 2.40% |
SHAPX ClearBridge Appreciation Fund | 15.01% | 14.08% | 9.00% | 4.17% | 8.85% | 6.54% | 4.13% | 7.09% | 6.71% | 5.10% | 3.29% | 4.76% |
Drawdowns
FDTRX vs. SHAPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDTRX drawdown since its inception was -48.10%, roughly equal to the maximum SHAPX drawdown of -46.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTRX and SHAPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDTRX | SHAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.10% | -46.19% | -1.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.39% | -10.57% | -9.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.10% | -20.53% | -27.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.10% | -32.21% | -15.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.39% | -8.74% | -11.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.22% | -4.79% | -4.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.24% | 2.29% | +3.95% |
Volatility
FDTRX vs. SHAPX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX) has a higher volatility of 7.58% compared to ClearBridge Appreciation Fund (SHAPX) at 3.74%. This indicates that FDTRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDTRX | SHAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.58% | 3.74% | +3.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.06% | 7.86% | +8.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.05% | 15.90% | +10.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.20% | 14.85% | +11.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.48% | 16.70% | +7.78% |