FDTRX vs. PRGTX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FDTRX (Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6) and PRGTX (T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund) are both Technology Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FDTRX returned 17.17%/yr vs 17.66%/yr for PRGTX. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FDTRX charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for PRGTX.

Performance

FDTRX vs. PRGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX) and T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDTRX achieves a 3.80% return, which is significantly lower than PRGTX's 25.08% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FDTRX having a 17.17% annualized return and PRGTX not far ahead at 17.66%.

FDTRX

• 1D: 2.05%
• 1M: -3.26%
• 6M: 5.13%
• YTD: 3.80%
• 1Y: 12.13%
• 3Y*: 19.70%
• 5Y*: 6.89%
• 10Y*: 17.17%
• ALL TIME*: 16.25%

PRGTX

• 1D: 1.19%
• 1M: -4.87%
• 6M: 21.92%
• YTD: 25.08%
• 1Y: 42.17%
• 3Y*: 31.27%
• 5Y*: 6.72%
• 10Y*: 17.66%
• ALL TIME*: 11.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FDTRX Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PRGTX T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FDTRX vs. PRGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDTRX Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6	3.80%	18.97%	31.01%	44.92%	-40.07%	12.90%	58.22%	36.84%	3.22%	39.87%
PRGTX T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund	25.08%	27.28%	33.12%	55.92%	-55.53%	8.85%	75.77%	34.22%	-10.07%	47.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FDTRX and PRGTX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2013	0.91

The correlation between FDTRX and PRGTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FDTRX vs. PRGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDTRX

FDTRX Risk / Return Rank: 10
FDTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
FDTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
FDTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
FDTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
FDTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

PRGTX

PRGTX Risk / Return Rank: 46
PRGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
PRGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
PRGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
PRGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
PRGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDTRX vs. PRGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX) and T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDTRX	PRGTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.40	1.35	-0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.70	1.83	-1.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.24	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.47	2.13	-1.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.36	7.12	-5.76

FDTRX vs. PRGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDTRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the PRGTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDTRX and PRGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDTRX vs. PRGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDTRX drawdown since its inception was -48.10%, smaller than the maximum PRGTX drawdown of -71.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTRX and PRGTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDTRX	PRGTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.10%	-71.18%	+23.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.39%	-18.50%	-1.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.19%	-26.67%	+0.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.10%	-65.29%	+17.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.10%	-65.29%	+17.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.67%	-13.24%	+4.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.10%	-21.45%	+12.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.04%	5.52%	+1.52%

Volatility

FDTRX vs. PRGTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX) is 9.06%, while T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) has a volatility of 11.53%. This indicates that FDTRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDTRX	PRGTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.06%	11.53%	-2.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.76%	25.45%	-5.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.90%	29.04%	-5.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.76%	32.65%	-5.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.88%	28.83%	-3.95%

FDTRX vs. PRGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDTRX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than PRGTX's 0.93% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDTRX vs. PRGTX - Dividend Comparison

FDTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.01%, while PRGTX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDTRX Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6	10.01%	10.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.36%	0.00%	0.71%	2.80%	1.71%	3.44%	2.40%
PRGTX T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.28%	27.71%	5.05%	0.15%	24.67%	15.81%	9.46%	10.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDTRX and PRGTX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, FDTRX and PRGTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FDTRX or PRGTX?

PRGTX has higher volatility (11.53%) compared to FDTRX (9.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDTRX dropped -48.10% vs PRGTX's -71.18%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.