FDTFX vs. FFSZX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FDTFX (Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class M) and FFSZX (Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6) are both Target Retirement Date funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FDTFX returned 4.56%/yr vs 11.25%/yr for FFSZX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDTFX charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FFSZX.

Performance

FDTFX vs. FFSZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class M (FDTFX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDTFX achieves a 6.72% return, which is significantly lower than FFSZX's 15.07% return.

FDTFX

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: 1.83%
• YTD: 6.72%
• 6M: 6.81%
• 1Y: 15.28%
• 3Y*: 10.61%
• 5Y*: 4.56%
• 10Y*: 7.08%

FFSZX

• 1D: 1.50%
• 1M: 3.35%
• YTD: 15.07%
• 6M: 15.13%
• 1Y: 32.79%
• 3Y*: 20.37%
• 5Y*: 11.25%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDTFX vs. FFSZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FDTFX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class M	6.72%	14.03%	6.56%	11.73%	-16.07%	8.11%	12.81%	6.13%
FFSZX Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6	15.07%	24.08%	14.41%	20.78%	-18.05%	16.81%	18.36%	9.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FDTFX and FFSZX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019	0.94

The correlation between FDTFX and FFSZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FDTFX vs. FFSZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDTFX

FDTFX Risk / Return Rank: 60
FDTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
FDTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
FDTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FDTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
FDTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

FFSZX

FFSZX Risk / Return Rank: 77
FFSZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
FFSZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FFSZX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
FFSZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
FFSZX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDTFX vs. FFSZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class M (FDTFX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDTFX	FFSZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	2.37	-0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	3.21	-0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.44	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.73	3.32	-0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.56	14.57	-3.01

FDTFX vs. FFSZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDTFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the FFSZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDTFX and FFSZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDTFX vs. FFSZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDTFX drawdown since its inception was -47.60%, which is greater than FFSZX's maximum drawdown of -31.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTFX and FFSZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDTFX	FFSZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.60%	-31.00%	-16.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.59%	-9.77%	+4.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.82%	-15.36%	+7.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.89%	-27.17%	+4.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.65%	-5.78%	+0.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.32%	2.22%	-0.90%

Volatility

FDTFX vs. FFSZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class M (FDTFX) is 3.17%, while Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX) has a volatility of 5.85%. This indicates that FDTFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFSZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDTFX	FFSZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.17%	5.85%	-2.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.33%	11.75%	-5.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.38%	13.73%	-6.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.96%	15.19%	-6.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.08%	17.11%	-8.03%

FDTFX vs. FFSZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDTFX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than FFSZX's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDTFX vs. FFSZX - Dividend Comparison

FDTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.42%, more than FFSZX's 4.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDTFX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2020 Fund Class M	7.42%	7.46%	4.43%	1.91%	9.03%	10.51%	6.72%	6.38%	9.26%	5.60%	4.09%	3.44%
FFSZX Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6	4.98%	3.82%	2.92%	2.26%	8.99%	7.98%	2.41%	1.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDTFX and FFSZX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, FDTFX and FFSZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FDTFX or FFSZX?

FFSZX has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to FDTFX (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDTFX dropped -47.60% vs FFSZX's -31.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFSZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.