PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDSVX vs. FZROX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDSVX vs. FZROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund (FDSVX) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDSVX achieves a 14.32% return, which is significantly higher than FZROX's 11.17% return.


FDSVX

1D
-0.98%
1M
5.61%
YTD
14.32%
6M
13.45%
1Y
29.32%
3Y*
25.11%
5Y*
14.57%
10Y*
19.00%

FZROX

1D
-0.76%
1M
4.12%
YTD
11.17%
6M
10.89%
1Y
28.18%
3Y*
22.18%
5Y*
12.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDSVX vs. FZROX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FDSVX
Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund
14.32%15.14%30.19%35.63%-24.43%22.93%43.43%33.77%-12.36%
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
11.17%17.23%23.94%26.20%-19.21%26.00%20.51%31.15%-12.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FDSVX and FZROX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2018

0.93

The correlation between FDSVX and FZROX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDSVX vs. FZROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDSVX
FDSVX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FDSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FDSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

FZROX
FZROX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FZROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZROX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FZROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZROX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDSVX vs. FZROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund (FDSVX) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDSVXFZROXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.42

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

3.18

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.15

14.69

-5.53

FDSVX vs. FZROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDSVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the FZROX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDSVX and FZROX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDSVXFZROXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

2.31

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.75

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.72

-0.19

Drawdowns

FDSVX vs. FZROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDSVX drawdown since its inception was -59.34%, which is greater than FZROX's maximum drawdown of -34.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDSVX and FZROX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDSVXFZROXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.34%

-34.96%

-24.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.53%

-8.89%

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.42%

-19.38%

-4.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.83%

-25.12%

-4.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

-0.76%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.60%

-5.51%

-7.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

1.92%

+1.36%

Volatility

FDSVX vs. FZROX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund (FDSVX) has a higher volatility of 4.38% compared to Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX) at 3.09%. This indicates that FDSVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FZROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDSVXFZROXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.38%

3.09%

+1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.74%

9.23%

+3.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.36%

12.25%

+4.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.36%

17.44%

+2.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.59%

20.13%

+0.46%

FDSVX vs. FZROX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDSVX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than FZROX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDSVX vs. FZROX - Dividend Comparison

FDSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than FZROX's 0.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDSVX
Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund
1.38%1.58%12.81%2.55%3.65%13.46%9.63%4.28%5.02%4.87%0.09%0.17%
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
0.92%1.02%1.16%1.36%1.57%1.25%1.27%1.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FDSVX and FZROX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDSVX has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to FZROX (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDSVX dropped -59.34% vs FZROX's -34.96%.

FZROX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDSVX and FZROX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer