PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDSVX vs. FOCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDSVX vs. FOCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund (FDSVX) and Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDSVX achieves a 14.32% return, which is significantly lower than FOCPX's 28.25% return. Over the past 10 years, FDSVX has underperformed FOCPX with an annualized return of 19.00%, while FOCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.70% annualized return.


FDSVX

1D
-0.98%
1M
5.61%
YTD
14.32%
6M
13.45%
1Y
29.32%
3Y*
25.11%
5Y*
14.57%
10Y*
19.00%

FOCPX

1D
0.52%
1M
9.69%
YTD
28.25%
6M
29.14%
1Y
61.72%
3Y*
35.08%
5Y*
19.28%
10Y*
22.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDSVX vs. FOCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDSVX
Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund
14.32%15.14%30.19%35.63%-24.43%22.93%43.43%33.77%-0.33%34.63%
FOCPX
Fidelity OTC Portfolio
28.25%22.21%38.95%42.64%-32.08%24.94%46.75%39.20%-3.30%38.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FDSVX and FOCPX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 1998

0.93

The correlation between FDSVX and FOCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDSVX vs. FOCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDSVX
FDSVX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FDSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FDSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

FOCPX
FOCPX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FOCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FOCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDSVX vs. FOCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund (FDSVX) and Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDSVXFOCPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.59

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

5.58

-3.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.15

24.68

-15.52

FDSVX vs. FOCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDSVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is lower than the FOCPX Sharpe Ratio of 3.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDSVX and FOCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDSVXFOCPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

3.56

-1.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.86

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

1.02

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.66

-0.12

Drawdowns

FDSVX vs. FOCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDSVX drawdown since its inception was -59.34%, smaller than the maximum FOCPX drawdown of -70.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDSVX and FOCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDSVXFOCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.34%

-70.25%

+10.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.53%

-11.29%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.42%

-24.82%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.83%

-37.05%

+7.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.09%

-37.05%

+5.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

0.00%

-0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.60%

-17.01%

+4.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

2.55%

+0.73%

Volatility

FDSVX vs. FOCPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund (FDSVX) is 4.38%, while Fidelity OTC Portfolio (FOCPX) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that FDSVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDSVXFOCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.38%

5.40%

-1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.74%

13.89%

-1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.36%

17.71%

-1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.36%

22.65%

-2.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.59%

22.43%

-1.84%

FDSVX vs. FOCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDSVX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than FOCPX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDSVX vs. FOCPX - Dividend Comparison

FDSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than FOCPX's 6.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDSVX
Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund
1.38%1.58%12.81%2.55%3.65%13.46%9.63%4.28%5.02%4.87%0.09%0.17%
FOCPX
Fidelity OTC Portfolio
6.06%7.78%16.76%0.05%4.06%11.53%6.23%7.58%7.93%4.86%3.24%5.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FDSVX and FOCPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FOCPX has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to FDSVX (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDSVX dropped -59.34% vs FOCPX's -70.25%.

FOCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.56 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDSVX and FOCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer