PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDSSX vs. FMILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDSSX vs. FMILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund (FDSSX) and Fidelity New Millennium Fund (FMILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDSSX achieves a 15.83% return, which is significantly higher than FMILX's 12.72% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FDSSX having a 15.36% annualized return and FMILX not far behind at 15.12%.


FDSSX

1D
0.34%
1M
5.88%
YTD
15.83%
6M
16.38%
1Y
37.40%
3Y*
22.85%
5Y*
13.15%
10Y*
15.36%

FMILX

1D
0.44%
1M
5.76%
YTD
12.72%
6M
9.36%
1Y
24.46%
3Y*
22.76%
5Y*
15.36%
10Y*
15.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDSSX vs. FMILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDSSX
Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund
15.83%18.89%19.79%26.94%-19.55%23.14%24.90%32.21%-8.61%24.42%
FMILX
Fidelity New Millennium Fund
12.72%12.97%28.83%25.37%-1.56%23.92%5.73%26.17%-6.31%19.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FDSSX and FMILX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 1992

0.89

The correlation between FDSSX and FMILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDSSX vs. FMILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDSSX
FDSSX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FDSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FDSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FMILX
FMILX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FMILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMILX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FMILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMILX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDSSX vs. FMILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund (FDSSX) and Fidelity New Millennium Fund (FMILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDSSXFMILXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.95

1.80

+1.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.95

2.37

+1.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.34

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.17

2.16

+2.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.16

7.83

+12.33

FDSSX vs. FMILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDSSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is higher than the FMILX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDSSX and FMILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDSSXFMILXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.95

1.80

+1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.91

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.84

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.63

-0.01

Drawdowns

FDSSX vs. FMILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDSSX drawdown since its inception was -56.77%, roughly equal to the maximum FMILX drawdown of -58.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDSSX and FMILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDSSXFMILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.77%

-58.56%

+1.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.19%

-11.86%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.86%

-20.48%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.22%

-20.48%

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.37%

-38.92%

+4.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.88%

-12.45%

+2.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

3.26%

-1.36%

Volatility

FDSSX vs. FMILX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund (FDSSX) is 3.37%, while Fidelity New Millennium Fund (FMILX) has a volatility of 3.62%. This indicates that FDSSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDSSXFMILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

3.62%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.00%

11.68%

-1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.99%

14.24%

-1.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.75%

16.89%

+0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.57%

18.02%

+0.55%

FDSSX vs. FMILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDSSX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FMILX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDSSX vs. FMILX - Dividend Comparison

FDSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, while FMILX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDSSX
Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund
4.13%4.79%4.83%2.03%0.36%0.84%5.22%6.09%4.46%3.07%1.04%5.16%
FMILX
Fidelity New Millennium Fund
0.00%0.00%3.64%3.87%4.19%8.25%8.60%4.72%18.25%7.84%6.65%11.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FDSSX and FMILX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FMILX has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to FDSSX (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDSSX dropped -56.77% vs FMILX's -58.56%.

FDSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDSSX and FMILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer