PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDRX vs. MUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDRX vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Founder-Led 2X Daily ETF (FDRX) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FDRX

1D
-4.53%
1M
-7.87%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MUU

1D
-26.28%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDRX vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FDRX and MUU is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026

0.70

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDRX vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Founder-Led 2X Daily ETF (FDRX) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FDRX vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDRX vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDRX drawdown since its inception was -39.78%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -26.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRX and MUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDRXMUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.78%

-26.28%

-13.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.32%

-26.28%

+3.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.00%

-10.19%

-9.81%

Volatility

FDRX vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDRXMUUDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.87%

295.32%

-236.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.87%

295.32%

-236.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.87%

295.32%

-236.45%

FDRX vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDRX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDRX vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

Neither FDRX nor MUU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FDRX and MUU have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MUU is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for FDRX.

FDRX and MUU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

FDRX tracks Founder Led Index, while MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). They also come from different issuers: Corgi Strategies and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for FDRX and 1.01% for MUU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDRX and MUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer