FDRX vs. CRMG

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

FDRX (Founder-Led 2X Daily ETF) and CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. FDRX is passively managed, while CRMG is actively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FDRX charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRMG.

Performance

FDRX vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Founder-Led 2X Daily ETF (FDRX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FDRX

• 1D: -4.23%
• 1M: -5.19%
• 6M: -15.44%
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRMG

• 1D: 6.77%
• 1M: 10.88%
• 6M: -53.43%
• YTD: -64.33%
• 1Y: -65.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDRX vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FDRX Founder-Led 2X Daily ETF	-17.29%
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	-55.79%

Correlation

The correlation between FDRX and CRMG is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2026	0.33

Return for Risk

FDRX vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDRX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CRMG

CRMG Risk / Return Rank: 2
CRMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
CRMG Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CRMG Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDRX vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Founder-Led 2X Daily ETF (FDRX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDRX	CRMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.85	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-1.33	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.85	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.87	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.45	—

Drawdowns

FDRX vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDRX drawdown since its inception was -39.78%, smaller than the maximum CRMG drawdown of -79.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRX and CRMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDRX	CRMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.78%	-79.83%	+40.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-75.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.87%	-73.90%	+55.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.83%	-41.04%	+21.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	45.39%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FDRX	CRMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	23.42%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	64.24%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.14%	77.97%	-19.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.14%	75.77%	-17.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.14%	75.77%	-17.63%

FDRX vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDRX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDRX vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison

Neither FDRX nor CRMG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDRX and CRMG in my portfolio?

FDRX and CRMG have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FDRX or CRMG?

On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDRX or CRMG?

CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for FDRX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDRX or CRMG?

FDRX and CRMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FDRX and CRMG?

They also come from different issuers: Corgi Strategies and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for FDRX and 0.75% for CRMG.