FDRX vs. BMNG
FDRX (Founder-Led 2X Daily ETF) and BMNG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. FDRX is passively managed, while BMNG is actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDRX charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BMNG.
Performance
FDRX vs. BMNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FDRX
- 1D
- -2.43%
- 1M
- -10.12%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BMNG
- 1D
- -14.39%
- 1M
- -48.93%
- YTD
- -83.92%
- 6M
- -86.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDRX vs. BMNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FDRX Founder-Led 2X Daily ETF | -22.73% |
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF | -88.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDRX and BMNG is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2026 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDRX vs. BMNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Founder-Led 2X Daily ETF (FDRX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDRX vs. BMNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDRX drawdown since its inception was -39.78%, smaller than the maximum BMNG drawdown of -97.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRX and BMNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDRX | BMNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.78% | -97.00% | +57.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.21% | -97.00% | +72.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.04% | -82.13% | +62.09% |
Volatility
FDRX vs. BMNG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDRX | BMNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.70% | 189.44% | -130.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.70% | 189.44% | -130.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.70% | 189.44% | -130.74% |
FDRX vs. BMNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDRX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than BMNG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDRX vs. BMNG - Dividend Comparison
Neither FDRX nor BMNG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FDRX and BMNG have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BMNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BMNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for FDRX.
FDRX and BMNG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Corgi Strategies and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for FDRX and 0.75% for BMNG.
Find the right allocation for FDRX and BMNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer