FDRS vs. BLCR
FDRS (Founder-Led ETF) and BLCR (Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. FDRS is passively managed, while BLCR is actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDRS charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for BLCR.
Performance
FDRS vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDRS achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly lower than BLCR's 18.88% return.
FDRS
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 10.17%
- YTD
- 1.52%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLCR
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 3.96%
- YTD
- 18.88%
- 6M
- 20.88%
- 1Y
- 45.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDRS vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FDRS Founder-Led ETF | 1.52% | -1.10% |
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF | 18.88% | -1.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDRS and BLCR is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDRS vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank
FDRS
BLCR
FDRS vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Founder-Led ETF (FDRS) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDRS | BLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 1.88 | -1.84 |
Drawdowns
FDRS vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDRS drawdown since its inception was -21.64%, roughly equal to the maximum BLCR drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRS and BLCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDRS | BLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.64% | -21.29% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.31% | -0.94% | -2.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.35% | -2.19% | -7.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.16% | — |
Volatility
FDRS vs. BLCR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDRS | BLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.26% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.36% | 15.55% | +12.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.36% | 17.46% | +10.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.36% | 17.46% | +10.90% |
FDRS vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDRS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDRS vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison
FDRS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF | 0.23% | 0.33% | 0.75% | 0.13% |
FDRS Founder-Led ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDRS and BLCR have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BLCR is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BLCR is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FDRS.
BLCR has the higher dividend yield at 0.23%, compared with 0.00% for FDRS.
They also come from different issuers: Corgi Strategies and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FDRS and 0.36% for BLCR.
Find the right allocation for FDRS and BLCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer