FDNU.L vs. IUCM.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FDNU.L (First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD) and IUCM.L (iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - FDNU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while IUCM.L is a Communications Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDNU.L returned 4.29%/yr vs 11.39%/yr for IUCM.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDNU.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUCM.L.

Performance

FDNU.L vs. IUCM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (FDNU.L) and iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDNU.L achieves a 4.34% return, which is significantly higher than IUCM.L's 1.60% return.

FDNU.L

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 5.40%
• YTD: 4.34%
• 6M: 4.66%
• 1Y: 10.19%
• 3Y*: 20.73%
• 5Y*: 4.29%
• 10Y*: —

IUCM.L

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: -2.81%
• YTD: 1.60%
• 6M: 1.52%
• 1Y: 20.87%
• 3Y*: 27.10%
• 5Y*: 11.39%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDNU.L vs. IUCM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FDNU.L First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD	4.34%	9.74%	30.52%	54.50%	-46.64%	7.05%	53.99%	17.77%	-16.47%
IUCM.L iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc	1.60%	26.48%	38.98%	55.75%	-40.54%	22.36%	22.64%	30.83%	-10.96%

Correlation

The correlation between FDNU.L and IUCM.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2018	0.81

The correlation between FDNU.L and IUCM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDNU.L vs. IUCM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDNU.L	IUCM.L
Technology	37.7%	0.6%
Communication Services	29.8%	99.1%
Consumer Cyclical	27.7%	-
Financial Services	2.4%	-
Industrials	1.4%	-
Healthcare	1.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FDNU.L vs. IUCM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDNU.L

FDNU.L Risk / Return Rank: 17
FDNU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
FDNU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
FDNU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 18
FDNU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
FDNU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 15

IUCM.L

IUCM.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
IUCM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
IUCM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
IUCM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 39
IUCM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
IUCM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDNU.L vs. IUCM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (FDNU.L) and iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDNU.L	IUCM.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.52	1.46	-0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.84	2.26	-1.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.25	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.49	2.14	-1.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.23	7.78	-6.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDNU.L vs. IUCM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDNU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the IUCM.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDNU.L and IUCM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDNU.L	IUCM.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52	1.46	-0.93
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16	0.57	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.73	-0.39

Drawdowns

FDNU.L vs. IUCM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDNU.L drawdown since its inception was -54.01%, which is greater than IUCM.L's maximum drawdown of -47.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDNU.L and IUCM.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDNU.L	IUCM.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.01%	-47.32%	-6.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.57%	-9.71%	-10.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.76%	-18.79%	-6.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.01%	-47.32%	-6.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.24%	-4.70%	+2.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.23%	-10.21%	-6.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.27%	2.67%	+5.60%

Volatility

FDNU.L vs. IUCM.L - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (FDNU.L) has a higher volatility of 5.89% compared to iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L) at 4.40%. This indicates that FDNU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUCM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDNU.L	IUCM.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.89%	4.40%	+1.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.23%	10.34%	+4.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.49%	14.28%	+5.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.10%	19.96%	+6.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.91%	20.34%	+5.57%

FDNU.L vs. IUCM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDNU.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than IUCM.L's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDNU.L vs. IUCM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FDNU.L nor IUCM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDNU.L and IUCM.L in my portfolio?

FDNU.L and IUCM.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FDNU.L or IUCM.L?

On fees, IUCM.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDNU.L or IUCM.L?

IUCM.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FDNU.L.

What is the main difference between FDNU.L and IUCM.L?

FDNU.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while IUCM.L is Communications Equities. FDNU.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while IUCM.L tracks MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FDNU.L and 0.15% for IUCM.L.