PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDNU.L vs. FTEU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDNU.L vs. FTEU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (FDNU.L) and First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FTEU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDNU.L achieves a 4.34% return, which is significantly lower than FTEU.L's 12.33% return.


FDNU.L

1D
0.72%
1M
5.40%
YTD
4.34%
6M
4.66%
1Y
10.19%
3Y*
20.73%
5Y*
4.29%
10Y*

FTEU.L

1D
0.25%
1M
2.06%
YTD
12.33%
6M
16.13%
1Y
32.73%
3Y*
25.79%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDNU.L vs. FTEU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FDNU.L
First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD
4.34%9.74%30.52%54.50%-46.64%7.05%53.99%17.77%-18.49%
FTEU.L
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares
12.33%57.74%2.77%16.49%-18.83%11.78%5.07%20.55%-17.62%

Correlation

The correlation between FDNU.L and FTEU.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2018

0.56

The correlation between FDNU.L and FTEU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDNU.L vs. FTEU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDNU.L
FTEU.L

Technology

37.7%
6.0%

Communication Services

29.8%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

27.7%
9.2%

Financial Services

2.4%
10.6%

Industrials

1.4%
27.4%

Healthcare

1.1%
5.2%

Basic Materials

-

7.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.3%

Energy

-

10.8%

Real Estate

-

6.0%

Utilities

-

8.3%

Technology

FDNU.L
37.7%
FTEU.L
6.0%

Communication Services

FDNU.L
29.8%
FTEU.L
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FDNU.L
27.7%
FTEU.L
9.2%

Financial Services

FDNU.L
2.4%
FTEU.L
10.6%

Industrials

FDNU.L
1.4%
FTEU.L
27.4%

Healthcare

FDNU.L
1.1%
FTEU.L
5.2%

Basic Materials

FDNU.L

-

FTEU.L
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

FDNU.L

-

FTEU.L
5.3%

Energy

FDNU.L

-

FTEU.L
10.8%

Real Estate

FDNU.L

-

FTEU.L
6.0%

Utilities

FDNU.L

-

FTEU.L
8.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDNU.L vs. FTEU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDNU.L
FDNU.L Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FDNU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDNU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDNU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FDNU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDNU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

FTEU.L
FTEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FTEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDNU.L vs. FTEU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (FDNU.L) and First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FTEU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDNU.LFTEU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.36

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

2.85

-2.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.23

10.09

-8.86

FDNU.L vs. FTEU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDNU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the FTEU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDNU.L and FTEU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDNU.LFTEU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

1.90

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.52

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.55

-0.21

Drawdowns

FDNU.L vs. FTEU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDNU.L drawdown since its inception was -54.01%, which is greater than FTEU.L's maximum drawdown of -46.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDNU.L and FTEU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDNU.LFTEU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.01%

-46.61%

-7.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.57%

-11.42%

-9.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.76%

-15.66%

-10.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.01%

-38.49%

-15.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

-1.03%

-1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.23%

-10.34%

-5.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.27%

3.24%

+5.03%

Volatility

FDNU.L vs. FTEU.L - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (FDNU.L) has a higher volatility of 5.89% compared to First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FTEU.L) at 5.53%. This indicates that FDNU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTEU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDNU.LFTEU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.89%

5.53%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.23%

14.10%

+1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.49%

17.14%

+2.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.10%

20.22%

+5.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.91%

19.86%

+6.05%

FDNU.L vs. FTEU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDNU.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FTEU.L's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDNU.L vs. FTEU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FDNU.L nor FTEU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FDNU.L and FTEU.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FDNU.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FDNU.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FTEU.L.

FDNU.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while FTEU.L is Europe Equities. FDNU.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while FTEU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FDNU.L and 0.80% for FTEU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDNU.L and FTEU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer