FDNI vs. GRW
FDNI (First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF) and GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. FDNI is passively managed, while GRW is actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FDNI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRW.
Performance
FDNI vs. GRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FDNI
- 1D
- -3.40%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- YTD
- -18.16%
- 6M
- -18.40%
- 1Y
- -12.94%
- 3Y*
- 8.13%
- 5Y*
- -8.73%
- 10Y*
- —
GRW
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDNI vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FDNI First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF | 1.33% |
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF | 1.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDNI and GRW is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.20 |
FDNI vs. GRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDNI
GRW
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
FDNI
GRW
Communication Services
FDNI
GRW
Technology
FDNI
GRW
Financial Services
FDNI
GRW
Real Estate
FDNI
GRW
-
Healthcare
FDNI
GRW
Basic Materials
FDNI
-
GRW
Consumer Defensive
FDNI
-
GRW
-
Energy
FDNI
-
GRW
-
Industrials
FDNI
-
GRW
Utilities
FDNI
-
GRW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDNI vs. GRW — Risk / Return Rank
FDNI
GRW
FDNI vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF (FDNI) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDNI | GRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.75 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDNI | GRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 14.00 | -13.85 |
Drawdowns
FDNI vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDNI drawdown since its inception was -71.08%, which is greater than GRW's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDNI and GRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDNI | GRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.08% | -0.45% | -70.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.38% | -0.45% | -48.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.55% | -0.14% | -34.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.27% | — | — |
Volatility
FDNI vs. GRW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDNI | GRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.96% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.80% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.95% | 10.19% | +13.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.63% | 10.19% | +26.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.57% | 10.19% | +24.38% |
FDNI vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDNI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than GRW's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDNI vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison
FDNI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, while GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDNI First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF | 1.36% | 1.12% | 1.07% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 3.12% |
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDNI and GRW have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDNI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDNI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRW.
FDNI has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FDNI and 0.75% for GRW.
Find the right allocation for FDNI and GRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer