PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDND vs. TIME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDND vs. TIME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND) and Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF (TIME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDND achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than TIME's 6.68% return.


FDND

1D
2.22%
1M
2.80%
6M
3.79%
YTD
0.56%
1Y
1.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.95%

TIME

1D
0.63%
1M
0.10%
6M
6.87%
YTD
6.68%
1Y
16.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$52.86K$42.66K$64.39K
$50.21K$44.64K$109.23K

FDND vs. TIME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FDND
FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF
0.56%9.69%19.80%
TIME
Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF
6.68%10.17%5.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FDND and TIME is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2024

0.67

The correlation between FDND and TIME shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDND vs. TIME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDND
FDND Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
FDND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDND Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDND Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FDND Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDND Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

TIME
TIME Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
TIME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIME Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIME Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
TIME Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIME Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDND vs. TIME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND) and Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF (TIME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDNDTIMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.20

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.08

1.20

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.18

4.09

-4.26

FDND vs. TIME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDND Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is lower than the TIME Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDND and TIME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDND vs. TIME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDND drawdown since its inception was -24.12%, roughly equal to the maximum TIME drawdown of -24.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDND and TIME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDNDTIMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.12%

-24.26%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.49%

-13.09%

-7.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.97%

-3.57%

-2.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

-5.44%

-0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.05%

3.83%

+5.22%

Volatility

FDND vs. TIME - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND) has a higher volatility of 5.55% compared to Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF (TIME) at 3.90%. This indicates that FDND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDNDTIMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.55%

3.90%

+1.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.62%

11.44%

+4.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.58%

14.19%

+5.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.40%

17.55%

+3.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.40%

17.55%

+3.85%

FDND vs. TIME - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDND has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TIME's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDND vs. TIME - Dividend Comparison

FDND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.09%, less than TIME's 9.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
FDND
FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF
8.09%8.11%5.51%
TIME
Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF
9.39%10.02%15.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDND and TIME have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDND has higher volatility (5.55%) compared to TIME (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDND dropped -24.12% vs TIME's -24.26%.

On 1-year performance, TIME leads with 16.12% vs 1.61% for FDND. On fees, FDND is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, TIME has been the lower-risk option at 3.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TIME has performed better with a 16.12% return vs 1.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDND is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for TIME.

TIME has the higher dividend yield at 9.39%, compared with 8.09% for FDND.

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Clockwise. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FDND and 1.00% for TIME.

TIME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDND and TIME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer